How to fix Australia permanently…

By Andrew Mackinnon

Last updated: 2nd March, 2024



How to fix Australia permanently…


The Australian federal, state and territorial governments have been deliberately increasing their debts for decades in order to necessitate higher taxes and thereby control Australian citizens.


Australia needs a publicly owned, federal “Australian Bank” that lends without charging interest.


Income tax should be collected by the Australian federal government at a flat rate of 25% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over.


Australian federal government employees have a fiduciary duty to Australian citizens…


It is possible to run Australia on income tax at a flat rate of 25% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over and Australian local government rates.


Condensed lists of proposed Australian federal government services and proposed Australian local government services…


The only tax should be income tax.


How to repay all Australian federal, state and territorial government debts in five years or less…


Abolish the Australian state and territorial governments so that only the Australian federal government and Australian local governments remain.


Move the Australian federal government from southern New South Wales to southern Queensland.


Other improvements to make to Australia so that it functions properly…


The Australian federal government needs a mission statement…



The Australian federal, state and territorial governments have been deliberately increasing their debts for decades in order to necessitate higher taxes and thereby control Australian citizens.


Unfortunately, Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists), like Scott Morrison, Joshua Frydenberg, Daniel Andrews and Gladys Berejiklian, have been deliberately increasing Australian federal, state and territorial government debts, in order to obligate Australian citizens to onerously pay interest on these debts out of their taxes to the Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) to whom these debts are owed as bondholders.

That is why former Australian Treasurer Joshua Frydenberg has shamelessly wasted little time in taking up employment with Goldman Sachs, a multinational investment bank that is headquartered in New York City, New York, United States of America, after being voted out of office as the elected representative for the Australian federal electorate of Kooyong in the last Australian federal election on 21st May, 2022, so that Joshua Frydenberg is now the chairman of Goldman Sachs in Australia and New Zealand.

Interestingly, while there is sufficient information available from the mainstream media in Australia confirming the appointment of Joshua Frydenberg as the chairman of Goldman Sachs in Australia and New Zealand, which can be accessed on the internet via search engines, there is nothing on the official Goldman Sachs web page for Goldman Sachs in Australia and New Zealand to indicate that Joshua Frydenberg is the chairman of Goldman Sachs in Australia and New Zealand.

It is like Goldman Sachs in Australia and New Zealand is trying to fly under the radar.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh_Frydenberg

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh_Frydenberg#Life_after_politics

goldmansachs.com/worldwide/australia-new-zealand/


The Australian federal government, predominated by Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) like Joshua Frydenberg, has been deliberately increasing the Australian federal government debt for decades via flagrantly wasteful spending, in order to justify selling publicly owned Australian federal government entities, which is widely known by Australian citizens as “privatisation” and widely disliked by Australian citizens, by claiming that the Australian federal government desperately needs to sell publicly owned Australian federal government entities in order to generate funds to deliver new projects (e.g. infrastructure), while continuing to repay principal and interest out of taxpayer funds on the Australia federal government debt it has deliberately increased via flagrantly wasteful spending.

Who do you think the principal and interest on this Australia federal government debt is paid to?

The principal and interest on this Australian federal government debt is partly paid to Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) who have carefully counted their money and eagerly lent to the Australian federal government in anticipation of the coupon payments (i.e. interest payments) they will receive from the Australian federal government bonds they buy from the Australian federal government, in order to jubilantly increase their net worth after paying income tax on the coupon payments they receive, if, in fact, they do pay income tax on the coupon payments they receive.

The principal and interest on this Australia federal government debt is also partly paid to Australian citizens via their superannuation balances, which have been partly invested by purchasing Australian federal government bonds (i.e. loaning principal to the Australian federal government out of their compulsory superannuation contributions), so that they are entitled to earn interest on the principal loaned to the Australian federal government via coupon payments made by the Australian federal government on these Australian federal government bonds.

Therefore, Australian citizens are partly paying principal and interest on this Australian federal government debt via their taxes to themselves as owners of their superannuation balances, which have been partly invested by purchasing Australian federal government bonds (i.e. loaning principal to the Australian federal government out of their compulsory superannuation contributions).

This does not benefit Australian citizens.

Australian federal government entities that the Australian federal government has sold, so that it can “afford to pay the interest bill on its Australian federal government debt” that it has deliberately increased via flagrantly wasteful spending, include Commonwealth Bank of Australia in the 1990s, QANTAS (Queensland and Northern Territory Aerial Services) in the 1990s and Telecom Australia in the 1990s and beyond.

Who do you think buys these Australian federal government entities?

Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) buy these Australian federal government entities via purchasing shares in the privately owned entities (e.g. Telstra) formed as a result of the sale of these Australian federal government entities, which are highly successful and well-managed Australian federal government entities by virtue of the diligence of the Australian federal government employees who have run them for decades prior to their sale.

Australian citizens also buy these Australian federal government entities via purchasing shares in the privately owned entities (e.g. Telstra) formed as a result of the sale of these Australian federal government entities and via purchasing these shares indirectly via their superannuation balances, which have been partly invested by purchasing these shares.

Once these highly successful and well-managed Australian federal government entities have been sold, the newly installed management teams of the privately owned entities (e.g. Telstra) formed as a result of the sale of these Australian federal government entities increase the prices of the services these entities provide, which are paid by Australian citizens, in order to seek to maximise the profits they generate from these former Australian federal government entities, which, theoretically, should have operated on not-for-profit bases when they were formerly owned by the Australian federal government, so that the prices of the services they provided when they were formerly owned by the Australian federal government should have been lower and, in fact, always were lower.

This the kind of greedy approach that is exhibited by the multinational investment bank Goldman Sachs and the Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) like Joshua Frydenberg who work for Goldman Sachs.


This is all certainly organised crime by the Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) who occupy the Australian federal government and who orchestrate all of this.

In my opinion, it is treason, which, in my opinion, is a capital crime whose convicted perpetrators should receive capital punishment involving death by hanging.

Former Australian Prime Minister John Howard, former Australian Treasurer Peter Costello, former Australian Prime Minister and former Australian Treasurer Paul Keating and former Australian Prime Minister Bob Hawke, who were all variously involved in orchestrating the sale of the Australian federal government entities, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, QANTAS and Telecom Australia, including deliberately increasing the Australian federal government debt beforehand via flagrantly wasteful spending, in order to justify the sale of these Australian federal government entities to Australian citizens, are all Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) but they are only puppets and front men for the many more Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) who occupy the Australian federal government and who were also involved in this treason, such as the many more of them who were involved in deliberately increasing the Australian government debt via flagrantly wasteful spending.


Ironically, former Australian Treasurer Joshua Frydenberg is one of the very few former Australian Treasurers who is actually qualified for the role, holding tertiary qualifications in both economics and law from Monash University in Melbourne, Victoria with presumably high levels of attainment.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh_Frydenberg#Early_life_and_education


However, Joshua Frydenberg does not care about using his formidable skills to improve Australia for the benefit of Australian citizens.  As a Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherent of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanist), his focus is on ensuring that Australian citizens continue to pay tribute as slaves to Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) via interest out of their taxes to the Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) to whom Australian federal, state and territorial government debts are partly owed as bondholders.

That is why the Australian federal government debt increased by more than $300 billion during Joshua Frydenberg’s time as the Australian Treasurer from 24th August, 2018 to 23rd May, 2022.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh_Frydenberg

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_government_debt


One might say, “But the cause of that increase in the Australian federal government debt was COVID-19 and all of the payments made by the Australian federal government to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities.”

That is true.  However, the overwhelming majority of this increase in Australian federal government debt of more than $300 billion is owed to the Reserve Bank of Australia. Importantly, the Australian federal government, including highly qualified Joshua Frydenberg as the Australian Treasurer, made very sure that Australian citizens are obligated to pay interest to the Reserve Bank of Australia on the overwhelming majority of this increase in Australian federal government debt of more than $300 billion owed to the Reserve Bank of Australia, despite that the Reserve Bank of Australia created the overwhelming majority of this increase in Australian federal government debt of more than $300 billion owed to the Reserve Bank of Australia out of nothing.


The Australian federal government debt is currently circa $1,150 billion.

australiandebtclock.com.au (“National Government Debt”, one-third of the way down the web page)



Top



Australia needs a publicly owned, federal “Australian Bank” that lends without charging interest.


Australia needs a publicly owned, federal “Australian Bank” that lends to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities, for mortgages, personal loans, business loans of all types and sizes and loans of all types and sizes to not-for-profit entities, without charging any interest on this lending to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities.

The Bank of England has admitted that commercial banks create money out of nothing when they lend at interest.


However, various rates of around 1% or less would need to be charged by the Australian Bank on all lending by the Australian Bank to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities, in order to cover the various incidences of default on loans to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities.

This Australian Bank should operate on a not-for-profit basis and could be funded via account-keeping fees and transaction fees.

The size of the money supply in Australia can be increased and decreased to control inflation by increasing and decreasing the amount of principal that the Australian Bank is allowed to lend to Australian citizens, Australian businesses (such as sole traders, partnerships and companies) and Australian not-for-profit entities (such as churches and charities) for different types of loans, expressed as a multiples of the incomes of Australian citizens, multiples of the profits of Australian businesses and multiples of the operating surpluses of Australian not-for-profit entities.

These multiples should be different for different types of lending, such as loans to Australian citizens (including mortgages and personal loans), loans to Australian businesses (including loans to sole traders, loans to partnerships and loans to companies) and loans to not-for-profit entities (including loans to churches and loans to charities).

Money is created when the Australian Bank lends to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities, so that the money supply in Australia increases.

Money is destroyed when Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities repay principal on loans they owe to the Australian Bank, so that the money supply in Australia decreases.

Therefore, when Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities borrow more money per unit time from the Australian Bank than Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities repay per unit time to the Australian Bank, such as when amounts of money lent by the Australian Bank to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities increase as multiples of their respective incomes, profits and operating surpluses, the money supply in Australia increases.

Therefore, when Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities borrow less money per unit time from the Australian Bank than Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities repay per unit time to the Australian Bank, such as when amounts of money lent by the Australian Bank to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities decrease as multiples of their respective incomes, profits and operating surpluses, the money supply in Australia decreases.

There would have to be strong guidelines for limiting government lending to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities, since the publicly owned Australian Bank would create all of the money that it lends so that the money supply increases when it lends. Unrestrained lending would lead to a rapidly increasing money supply and associated inflation of prices of goods (e.g. groceries), services (e.g. residential properties for rent) and assets (e.g. residential properties).

The analog of interest-only loans, being loans with no repayments whatsoever until repayment of the entire principal of the loan, would not be allowed by the Australian Bank under any circumstances.

Australian citizens would be able to borrow from the Australian Bank in order to buy a residential property in which to live but they would not be able to borrow from the Australian Bank in order to buy a residential property as an investment to rent out in order to earn income. Investment would need to be funded out of savings, including investment in residential properties and shares, to name just two investments.

The amount that the Australian Bank would lend to any given Australian citizen for any given purpose, such as buying a residential property in which to live, would be limited by factors such as the income of the Australian citizen and the size of the deposit that the Australian citizen has saved towards the purchase, with zero dollars obviously being the minimum possible size of the deposit saved. The Australian Bank would decide upon the multiple of the income of any given Australian citizen (such as 3.0 times) to lend to them for any given purpose, such as buying a residential property in which to live or buying a motor vehicle.

The size of the money supply in Australia can also be increased as necessary by way of the Australian Bank creating money out of nothing as necessary in the account of the Australian Treasury with the Australian Bank for the Australian Treasury to spend into circulation as strictly necessary on behalf of the Australian federal government, even by giving it to Australian citizens as strictly necessary in proportion to the amount of net tax they have paid to the Australian federal government over their lives, being tax paid to the Australian federal government over their lives minus refunds by the Australian federal government at the end of each financial year of tax paid to the Australia federal government over their lives (currently known as “income tax refunds”) minus repayments by the Australian federal government in good faith at the end of each financial year of tax paid to the Australian federal government during each financial year over their lives, on account of the Australian federal government sensibly and admirably not spending that tax during each financial year, as a result of the Australian federal government only delivering strictly necessary services (including strictly necessary infrastructure projects) and as a result of its care in managing taxpayer funds.

(The manner in which the Australian Bank creates money out of nothing as necessary in the account of the Australian Treasury with the Australian Bank is by debiting the asset account of “Australian Currency” for the amount of money created and crediting the liability account of the account of the Australian Treasury with the Australian Bank for the amount of money created.)

The size of the money supply in Australia can also be decreased as necessary by way of the Australian Bank destroying money collected by the Australian Treasury via income taxes paid by Australian citizens into the account of the Australian Treasury with the Australian Bank.

(The manner in which the Australian Bank destroys money collected by the Australian Treasury via income taxes paid by Australian citizens into the account of the Australian Treasury with the Australian Bank is by debiting the liability account of the account of the Australian Treasury with the Australian Bank for the amount of money destroyed and crediting the asset account of “Australian Currency” for the amount of money destroyed.)

However, it is best for the Australian federal government to avoid directing the Australian Bank to create money and bringing it into circulation in order to increase the size of the money supply by spending the money on one or more Australian federal government projects or giving the money to Australian citizens, because the only way for the Australian federal government to subsequently destroy this money, in order to decrease the size of the money supply as necessary, is to destroy money in the form of taxes collected from taxpayers in Australia.

Since I favour the lowest possible taxation in Australia, in the form of a flat rate of income tax of 25% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over, by abolishing the tax-free threshold, with income tax collected during any given financial year that is unspent at the end of the financial year repaid to taxpayers at the end of the financial year in proportion to the amount of income tax they have paid during the financial year, there is little opportunity for the Australian federal government to destroy income tax collected in order to decrease the size of the money supply as necessary.

(I previously believed that income tax should be collected by the Australian federal government at a flat rate of a maximum of 20% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over, by abolishing the tax-free threshold. However, this is not a high enough rate of income tax to fund the services that the Australian federal government should provide to Australian citizens.

A flat rate of income tax of a maximum of 20% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over is not sufficient to pay for the delivery of all or even any strictly necessary infrastructure projects (such as the construction of new government buildings, roads, schools, universities, hospitals, railway lines, dams, power stations and ports).)

Income tax collected by the Australian federal government is needed to fund the operation of the Australian federal government, to fund the services that the Australian federal government delivers to Australian citizens and to fund the projects that the Australian federal government embarks upon and completes, such as infrastructure projects, in order to improve Australia for the benefit of Australian citizens.

It has taken me the best part of a decade to understand beyond any doubt that a publicly owned Australian Bank that is operated by the Australian federal government should ideally create all of the money in circulation via lending to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities.

If the Australian federal government has a shortfall in income tax revenue, it should only direct the Australian Bank with caution to sparingly create money by crediting the relevant account of the Australian federal government on the liability side of the balance sheet of the Australia Bank with newly created-out-of-nothing money and debiting an account called “Currency” on the assets side of the balance sheet of the Australian Bank for the same amount, so that the Australian federal government can spend that money into circulation, such as by paying the salaries and wages of Australian federal government employees, since the only way for the Australian federal government to destroy money in circulation that has been created by the Australian Bank crediting the relevant account of the Australian federal government with money to spend into circulation, as opposed to money that has been created by the Australian Bank lending to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities, is for the Australian Bank to destroy income tax that has been collected by the Australian federal government by debiting the relevant account of the Australian federal government for the amount of income tax to be destroyed and crediting an account called “Currency” on the assets side of the balance sheet of the Australian Bank for the same amount. Therefore, if the Australian federal government has a shortfall in income tax revenue, it is obviously best if the Australian federal government anticipates collecting sufficient income tax in the future, before directing the Australian Bank to create money by crediting the relevant account of the Australian federal government with the newly created-out-of-nothing money, so that the Australian Bank can destroy that money in the future by destroying income tax collected by the Australian federal government in the future.



Top



Income tax should be collected by the Australian federal government at a flat rate of 25% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over.


Income tax should be collected by the Australian federal government at a flat rate of 25% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over.

The tax-free threshold, which exempts income below the tax-free threshold from income tax, should be abolished.

The Australian federal government should treat all Australian citizens aged 18 years or over equally, by charging them the same flat rate of income tax of 25% on all income earned, irrespective of their incomes, whether high or low.

The income tax rate in Australia should never exceed a flat rate of 25% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over under any circumstances.

(I previously believed that income tax should be collected by the Australian federal government at a flat rate of a maximum of 20% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over, by abolishing the tax-free threshold. However, this is not a high enough rate of income tax to fund the services that the Australian federal government should provide to Australian citizens.

A flat rate of income tax of a maximum of 20% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over is not sufficient to pay for the delivery of all or even any strictly necessary infrastructure projects (such as the construction of new government buildings, roads, schools, universities, hospitals, railway lines, dams, power stations and ports).)

A flat rate of income tax of 25% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over, by abolishing the tax-free threshold, makes all Australian citizens who pay income tax contributors to the health of Australia on behalf of all Australian citizens and therefore legitimate stakeholders in the Australian federal government.

Abolishing the tax-free threshold will restore a sound, logical, comprehensible basis for the operation of the Australian economy for the benefit of Australian citizens, whereby the Australian federal government works in harmony with free enterprise, which comprises the majority of economic activity in Australia.


As far as I can tell, the number of Australian citizens who submit a tax return in Australia is about 15 million and the average taxable income declared on these tax returns is about $68,000.

ato.gov.au/About-ATO/Research-and-statistics/

ato.gov.au/About-ATO/Research-and-statistics/In-detail/Taxation-statistics/

ato.gov.au/About-ATO/Research-and-statistics/In-detail/Taxation-statistics/Taxation-statistics-2020-21/

ato.gov.au/About-ATO/Research-and-statistics/In-detail/Taxation-statistics/Taxation-statistics-2020-21/?anchor=IndividualsStatistics#IndividualsStatistics

ato.gov.au/About-ATO/Research-and-statistics/In-detail/Taxation-statistics/Taxation-statistics-2020-21/?anchor=IndividualsStatistics#Table5Individuals

(bottom number of individuals)

ato.gov.au/About-ATO/Research-and-statistics/In-detail/Taxation-statistics/Taxation-statistics-2020-21/?anchor=IndividualsStatistics#Table3Individuals

(top-right average taxable income)


If the only tax in Australia was income tax at a flat rate of 25% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over, by abolishing the tax-free threshold, the amount of taxation revenue that the Australian federal government would raise in one year would be about 15 million x $68,000 x 0.25, which equals $255,000 million or $255 billion.


Compulsory superannuation contributions provide another 1.65% in income tax (i.e. 11% compulsory superannuation contribution rate x 15% tax rate), amounting to $16.8 billion (i.e. 1.65/25 x $255).

“Concessional contributions are taxed in your super fund at the rate of 15%, payable by the fund.”

Last sentence under “Concessional contributions”:

ato.gov.au/individuals-and-families/super-for-individuals-and-families/super/growing-and-keeping-track-of-your-super/caps-limits-and-tax-on-super-contributions/understanding-concessional-and-non-concessional-contributions#ato-Concessionalcontributions


Compulsory superannuation, comprising compulsory superannuation contributions, should be abolished, so that this money would be received by Ausralian citizens as income earned (since employers do not pay superannuation as a gift, on account of employees earning it), so that the rate of income tax on this income earned would be a flat rate of 25%, providing another 2.75% in income tax (i.e. 11% compulsory superannuation contribution rate x 25%), amounting to $28.1 billion (i.e. 2.75/25 x 255).

Therefore, by abolishing compulsory superannuation, comprising compulsory superannuation contributions, the amount of taxation revenue that the Australian federal government would raise in one year would be about $255 billion plus $28.1 billion, which equals $283.1 billion.


If anybody wonders how Australian citizens could possibly fund their common needs with a flat rate of income tax of 25% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over, which would raise circa $283.1 billion in taxation revenue in one year, by abolishing compulsory superannuation, comprising compulsory superannuation contributions, I’ll tell you.

Don’t provide the entities responsible for delivering Australian federal government projects with super profits, such as the $50 billion that the Australian federal government committed for a fleet of twelve submarines in 2019, which has now infamously increased to an even larger amount.  Start looking at the largest amounts to find waste in Australian federal government spending and work your way down – all the way down.  Australian federal government spending could easily be reduced by 30% with no reduction in the quality of Australian federal government services provided.


The objective of the Australian federal government should be to spend just enough and no more, in the course of delivering Australian federal government services to Australian citizens who benefit from them, to ensure that they are high-quality services and to ensure that they remain high-quality services, because Australian citizens who pay income tax to the Australian federal government fund Australian federal government services via the income tax they pay to the Australian federal government.

The more Australian federal government services cost to run, the more income tax Australian citizens who pay income tax will need to pay in order to fund these services and the more time Australian citizens who pay income tax will need to spend working each week in order to earn income (i.e. money) to fund these services, thereby leaving Australian citizens who pay income tax with less time to spend working each week in order to earn income (i.e. money) to provide for their own needs, thereby leaving Australian citizens who pay income tax with less income (i.e. money) each week to provide for their own needs, thereby decreasing their quality of life.

The less Australian federal government services cost to run, the less income tax Australian citizens who pay income tax will need to pay in order to fund these services and the less time Australian citizens who pay income tax will need to spend working each week in order to earn income (i.e. money) to fund these services, thereby leaving Australian citizens who pay income tax with more time to spend working each week in order to earn income (i.e. money) to provide for their own needs, thereby leaving Australian citizens who pay income tax with more income (i.e. money) each week to provide for their own needs, thereby increasing their quality of life.


It should be possible to fund the primary functions of the Australian federal, state and territorial governments, excluding “Australian Infrastructure”, as I have defined them notionally in the list of proposed Australian federal goverment services in the section below titled, “It is possible to run Australia on income tax at a flat rate of 25% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over and Australian local government rates.”, via income tax of about $242.3 billion per year.

(However, the primary functions of the Australian federal, state and territorial governments, excluding “Australian Infrastructure”, as I have defined them notionally in the list of proposed Australian federal goverment services below, do not include spending on the delivery of all strictly necessary Australian federal, state and territorial government infrastructure projects (such as the construction of new Australian federal, state and territorial government buildings, roads, schools, universities, hospitals, railway lines, dams, power stations and ports), which is accounted for under “Australian Infrastructure” in the list of proposed Australian federal goverment services below.)

This leaves up to about $40.8 billion per year in income tax, which can be spent on the delivery of all strictly necessary Australian federal, state and territorial government infrastructure projects (such as the construction of new Australian federal, state and territorial government buildings, roads, schools, universities, hospitals, railway lines, dams, power stations and ports), which is accounted for under “Australian Infrastructure” in the list of proposed Australian federal goverment services below.

(The annual budget of Australian Infrastructure of up to $40.8 billion (i.e. a maximum of $40.8 billion) can be preserved by reducing wasteful or unnecessary spending on the primary functions of the Australian federal, state and territorial governments, as I have defined them notionally in the list of proposed Australian federal goverment services below, apart from all welfare payments, which primary functions of the Australian federal, state and territorial governments should ideally cost approximately $120 billion per year, in order to free up income tax to allocate to the annual budget of Australian Infrastructure, thereby preserving the annual budget of Australian Infrastructure.

It is possible to reduce salaries and wages paid to Australian federal, state and territorial government employees who carry out the primary functions of the Australian federal, state and territorial governments, as I have defined them notionally in the list of proposed Australian federal goverment services below, to more realistic levels, such as by linking the amounts paid in salaries and wages to these Australian federal, state and territorial government employees to the performance of these Australian federal, state and territorial government employees.

It is possible to reduce wasteful expenditure on capital items, such as unnecessary upgrades to Australian federal, state and territorial government facilities, computer equipment and office fittings, so that a suitable return on investment is obtained from existing capital items, such as existing Australian federal, state and territorial government facilities, computer equipment and office fittings, by seeking to maximise the service lives of existing capital items within reason.

The annual budget of Australian Infrastructure of up to $40.8 billion (i.e. a maximum of $40.8 billion) can also be preserved by way of the Australian federal government diligently administering the integrity and means testing of the payments associated with Australian Elderly Care, Australian Disability Support (currently “National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS)”), Australian Elderly (i.e. Elderly Payments), Australian Disability (i.e. Disability Payments), Australian Carers (i.e. Carer Payments), Australian Children (i.e. Child Carer Payments) and Australian Unemployed (i.e. Unemployment Payments), in order to free up income tax to allocate to the annual budget of Australian Infrastructure, thereby preserving the annual budget of Australian Infrastructure.)

Once a strictly necessary Australian federal, state or territorial government infrastructure project is identified, the Australian federal, state or territorial governments should ensure that they spend enough on it and no more, in order to deliver a high-quality outcome that will provide value to taxpayers, by minimising the construction cost of the strictly necessary infrastructure project divided by its useful life in years until it is obsolete and it is no longer of any service to Australian citizens.


Any income tax collected by the Australian federal government during any given financial year, at a flat rate of 25% on all income earned, that has sensibly and admirably not been spent by the Australian federal government during the financial year, as a result of the Australian federal government only delivering strictly necessary services and strictly necessary infrastructure projects and as a result of its care in managing taxpayer funds, should be repaid by the Australian federal government in good faith at the end of the financial year to each taxpayer who has paid income tax during the financial year, in proportion to the amount of income tax paid by each taxpayer during the financial year, adjusted for any income tax refund owing to each taxpayer.

Whereas what are currently known as “income tax refunds” are repayments by the Australian federal government at the end of any given financial year of overpayments of income tax by taxpayers during the financial year, these “income tax repayments” of unspent income tax by the Australian federal government at the end of any given financial year constitute repayments of income tax that has been paid by taxpayers during the financial year but has sensibly and admirably not been spent by the Australian federal government, as a result of the Australian federal government only delivering strictly necessary services and strictly necessary infrastructure projects and as a result of its care in managing taxpayer funds.


No deductions should be allowed against income, so that there would be no income tax refund owing to each taxpayer at the end of any given financial year.



Top



Australian federal government employees have a fiduciary duty to Australian citizens…


Australian federal government employees have a fiduciary duty to Australian citizens to ensure that the income tax collected by the Australia federal government is spent effectively and efficiently in order to deliver Australian federal government services to Australian citizens and to ensure that this income tax is not misappropriated (e.g. stolen or misused).

For this reason, any Australian citizen who has at least one criminal conviction should be banned from being hired by the Australian federal government as an Australian federal government employee or working for the Australian federal government as an Australian federal government employee, without any exceptions, irrespective of how intelligent, capable, qualified, resourceful, hard-working or any other positive attribute, that Australian citizen is.

The Australian federal government should conduct police checks on every existing Australian federal government employee as soon as possible.

The Australian federal government should subsequently terminate the employment of any Australian federal government employee with at least one criminal conviction as soon as possible, without any exceptions, irrespective of how intelligent, capable, qualified, resourceful, hard-working or any other positive attribute, that Australian citizen is.


Australian federal government employees constitute a very small minority of Australian citizens who perform paid work via employment or self-employment, being the Australian workforce.

In order to ensure that Australian federal government employees deliver the highest-quality services possible for the lowest cost possible, funded by income tax that Australian citizens who pay income tax pay compulsorily to the Australian federal government, it is important that the Australian federal government only hires Australian citizens as Australian federal government employees who display evidence of all of the following characteristics:

> conducting themselves with honesty and integrity

> working diligently in employment or in self-employment

> wanting to serve the best interests of all Australian citizens through the work required of the Australian federal government role they will occupy


The Australian federal government should evaluate every existing Australian federal government employee as soon as possible.

The Australian federal government should subsequently terminate the employment of any Australian federal government employee who does not display evidence of all of the following characteristics:

> conducting themselves with honesty and integrity

> working diligently in their Australian federal government role

> wanting to serve the best interests of all Australian citizens through the work required of their Australian federal government role


Australian federal government employees deliver Australian federal government services to all Australian citizens in return for the income tax that Australian citizens who pay income tax pay to the Australian federal government.

All Australian citizens rely on Australian federal government employees to deliver the highest-quality services possible for the lowest cost possible, funded by income tax that Australian citizens who pay income tax pay compulsorily to the Australian federal government, so that Australian federal government employees are very important Australian citizens whose standard of work largely determines the standard of the Australian federal government.

Therefore, all Australian federal government employees should be paid market rates for the work they perform.

If the standard of work of any given Australian federal government employee is high, then they should be paid a high market rate.

If the standard of work of any given Australian federal government employee is average, they should be paid an average market rate.

If the standard of work of any given Australian federal government employee is low, then they should be terminated as an Australian federal government employee.



Top



It is possible to run Australia on income tax at a flat rate of 25% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over and Australian local government rates.


Following is a list of proposed Australian federal government services, together with their estimated annual budgets from income tax in billions (b) of dollars (i.e. thousands of millions of dollars) and their proposed sources of funding:


(Excluding “Australian Infrastructure”, the total estimated annual budget in billions of dollars, funded via income tax, of the proposed Australian federal government services in the following list is $242.180 billion.

Including “Australian Infrastructure”, which has an estimated annual budget of up to $40.800 billion (i.e. a maximum of $40.800 billion), the total estimated annual budget in billions of dollars, funded via income tax, of the proposed Australian federal government services in the following list is up to $282.980 billion (i.e. a maximum of $282.980 billion).)


> $0.200 b – Australian Discussion – Income tax

Australian citizens have little say in the direction in which the Australian federal government takes Australia and have had little say for decades.

Australian citizens urgently need a formal, structured mechanism for voicing their opinions to the Australian federal government about policy, legislation and issues that necessarily affect their interests as Australian citizens and the health of Australia.

In the interests of protecting and enhancing democracy in Australia, the Australian federal government should operate a discussion forum on the internet, named “Australian Discussion”, as an Australian federal government service to Australian citizens, which is exclusively concerned with Australian federal government policy, legislation and issues, that necessarily affect the interests of Australian citizens and the health of Australia as a nation, so that Australian citizens can participate in such a discussion forum on the internet, in order to provide their views in good faith on Australian federal government policy, legislation and issues and discuss Australian federal government policy, legislation and issues with other Australian citizens, as a means of effectively and efficiently informing elected representatives in the Australian federal government and Australian federal government employees in the Australian federal government services of the views of Australian citizens regarding Australian federal government policy, legislation and issues.

Since such a discussion forum on the internet would be operated by the Australian federal government, Australian citizens would hopefully be motivated to participate in good faith and ensure that the views they put forward and the discussions they conduct conform to high standards of integrity.

Obviously, it would be in the best interests of Australian citizens participating in such a discussion forum on the internet to put forward their views and conduct discussions in the best possible manner, in order to convince other Australian citizens participating in such a discussion forum on the internet to adopt their views.

However, by enabling Australian citizens to discuss Australian federal government policy, legislation and issues with each other, such a discussion forum on the internet would provide Australian citizens with opportunities to learn from the views of other Australian citizens about Australian federal government policy, legislation and issues and adjust their own views when they realise that the views of other Australian citizens better serve the interests of Australian citizens and the health of Australia as a nation.

The website for Australian Discussion should be “australian-discussion.gov.au”.


> $0.500 b – Australian Audit – Income tax

(i.e. audit, both financial and non-financial, of all components of the Australian federal government, all components of all Australian local governments, all Australian citizens, non-citizens of Australia, all Australian businesses, all foreign businesses in Australia, all Australian not-for-profit entities, all foreign not-for-profit entities in Australia)


> $0.200 b – Australian Reporting – Income tax

(i.e. single source of all reporting, both financial and non-financial, on all components of the Australian federal government and all components of all Australian local governments)


> $0.100 b – Australian Elections – Income tax – Comprising:

~ $0.150 b – Australian Federal Government Elections – Income tax

~ $0.150 b – Australian Federal Government Referendums – Income tax

~ $0.100 b – Australian Local Government Elections – Income tax


> $0.050 b – Australian Parliament – Income tax – Comprising:

(currently “Federal Parliament”)

~ $0.050 b – Australian Parliament Services – Income tax

(currently “Department of Parliamentary Services”)

~ $0.020 b – Australian Parliament Analysis – Income tax

(currently “Parliamentary Budget Office”)

[Hold an Australian referendum on abolishing the Australian Senate on account of its anti-democratic nature in the form of its tendency to vote against constructive legislation that a majority of elected Australian representatives in the House of Representatives in the Australian federal parliament have agreed to.]

~ $0.750 b – Australian Forum of Representatives – Income tax

(currently “House of Representatives”)

Redefine existing Australian electorates of elected Australian Representatives in the Australian Forum of Representatives in the Australian Parliament to match existing Australian local government areas, which number circa five hundred thirty-seven (537).

There should be one elected Australian Representative from each Australian electorate in the Australian Forum of Representatives in the Australian Parliament, numbering circa five hundred thirty-seven (537) elected Australian Representatives.

The vote of each elected Australian Representative in the Australian Forum of Representatives in the Australian Parliament should be weighted according to the number of Australian citizens aged eighteen (18) years or over in their Australian electorate at the start of the current financial year as a percentage of the total number of Australian citizens aged eighteen (18) years or over in the entirety of Australia at the start of the current financial year.

The Australian Forum of Representatives in the Australian Parliament should set up a computerised voting system for the Australian Forum of Representatives in the Australian Parliament in order to facilitate the effective and efficient use of weighted votes of the elected Australian Representatives in the Australian Forum of Representatives in the Australian Parliament.


The operation of the Australian federal parliament, conducted via oral representations made by elected Australian federal representatives on behalf of Australian citizens, has failed in Australia.

The task in the Australian federal parliament of representing circa seventeen (17) million Australian citizens of voting age eighteen (18) years or over via oral representations made on behalf of Australian citizens in the Australian federal parliament is too great for one hundred fifty-one (151) elected Australian federal representatives of Australian citizens in the Australian federal parliament and is even too great for circa five hundred thirty-seven (537) elected representatives in the Australian federal parliament, representing each of the circa five hundred thirty-seven (537) Australian local government areas.

The operation of the Australian federal parliament, conducted via written representations made by elected Australian federal representatives on behalf of Australian citizens on a purpose-built, online discussion forum, hosted on a website on the internet, complete with presumably configurable polls for voting on issues via the internet, will ensure the success of the Australian federal parliament.

Fortuitously, such a purpose-built, online discussion forum, hosted on the internet, can be readily configured to enable Australian citizens to read the discussions amongst their elected Australian Representatives take place without obviously allowing them to participate in these discussions, on account of their enormous numbers in the millions in comparison to the maximum of circa five hundred thirty-seven (537) elected Australian representatives taking part in these online discussions in good faith.

This method of debating issues online in writing on a purpose-built discussion forum will require more time per given issue being debated.

However, this method of debating issues online in writing on a purpose-built discussion forum will achieve a vastly superior result to the existing method of debating issues in person via oral representations made by elected Australian federal representatives on behalf of Australian citizens.

Objectively, anybody can learn to touch-type without looking at their fingers on the keyboard. All it takes is 15 minutes practice each day for one to three months.

Learning to touch-type is actually enjoyable because it is the process of learning a highly valuable skill. Obviously, the longer one practices touch-typing each day, the quicker one will learn to touch-type. However, it is really only necessary to practice touch-typing for 15 minutes each day in order to learn how to touch-type. After a while, touch-typing without looking at one’s fingers becomes second nature, which is a highly valuable skill that produces enormous benefits on a daily basis.

TypeQuick supplies excellent touch-typing courses which teach the correct fingering to use in a fun way and can be completed online.

typequick.com.au

typequick.com.au/about-typequick

typequick.com.au/products


~ $0.025 b – Australian Forum of Representatives Services – Income tax

(currently “Department of the House of Representatives”)


> $0.150 b – Australian Prime Minister and Cabinet – Income tax

(currently “Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet”)


> $0.400 b – Australian Attorney-General – Income tax

(currently “Attorney-General’s Department”)


> $10.000 b – Australian Police Force – Income tax


> $1.000 b – Australian Judiciary – Income tax

(i.e. court system)


> $0.010 b – Australian Execution – Income tax

(i.e. capital punishment involving death by hanging for capital crimes, being treason (e.g. election fraud, fraud of non-existent COVID-19), murder, pedophilia, rape, aggravated assault, kidnapping, gang stalking and arson)

Criminals in Australia regularly commit capital crimes and then slink off to prison for at least ten years, costing taxpayers in Australia at least $500,000, as though they have won some kind of lottery.

However, it should not cost more than $5,000 to execute a convicted perpetrator of a capital crime by hanging, including video-recording the execution, publishing the video on the internet for Australian citizens to watch and cremating the body.

Obviously capital punishment involving death by hanging for capital crimes, being treason (e.g. election fraud, fraud of non-existent COVID-19), murder, pedophilia, rape, aggravated assault, kidnapping, gang stalking and arson, provides a strong deterrent to Australian citizens against committing capital crimes.


> $1.500 b – Australian Prisons – Income tax

(i.e. incarceration of convicted perpetrators of non-capital crimes)


> $1.000 b – Australian Border Force – Income tax

(i.e. border patrol of Australia, apprehension of illegal immigrants in Australia, customs, drug enforcement)


> $0.750 b – Australian Detention – Income tax

(i.e. detention of illegal immigrants in Australia)

The Australian federal government should minimise its spending on Australian Detention to the greatest extent possible, by using aircraft and personnel from the Australian Air Force to fly illegal immigrants in Australia back to their countries of origin, under guard and under threat of force (that is appropriate for the interior of aircraft), as quickly as possible after they have been apprehended by Australian Border Force.

This strategy would send a strong message of deterrence to any citizens of other countries around the world who are considering migrating to Australia illegally, such as by boat.


> $10.000 b – Australian Defence Force – Income tax

(i.e. defence of Australia, defence of other white countries, defence of other countries)

The Australian federal government cannot realistically afford to spend more than $10 billion per year on defence.

Talk of the risk of China invading Australia is asinine for two reasons.

Firstly, the risk of China invading Australia can easily be mitigated by banning all exports from Australia to China, including coal and iron ore, which would place immense pressure on China so that it would cease to function effectively, rendering it incapable of invading Australia.

Secondly, the Australian federal government has pursued a deliberate strategy of strengthening China economically and militarily over the past two decades at least by enthusiastically encouraging the transfer of a substantial proportion of the manufacturing industry of Australia to China (even declaring that this was the right thing to do, because “it has lifted hundreds of millions of Chinese people out of poverty”) and by allowing exports from Australia to China, including coal and iron ore, which China uses to make steel, so that it can manufacture military hardware, including warships.

(Many of the jobs associated with manufacturing, including administrative jobs, are high-quality jobs. With the transfer of a substantial proportion of the manufacturing industry of Australia to China, Australia has lost a substantial number of these high-quality jobs to China.)


> $0.000 b – Australian Bank – Not-for-profit – User pays – Account-keeping fees and transaction fees

(currently privatised)


> $0.050 b – Australian Treasury – Income tax – Comprising:

(currently “Department of the Treasury”)

~ $0.750 b – Australian Taxation – Income tax

(currently “Australian Taxation Office”)

~ $0.200 b – Australian Statistics – Income tax

(currently “Australian Bureau of Statistics”)

~ $0.050 b – Australian Analysis – Income tax

(i.e. economic and financial analysis)

~ $0.050 b – Australian Productivity – Income tax

(currently “Productivity Commission”)

~ $0.050 b – Australian Management – Income tax

(i.e. economic and financial management)

Australian Management has responsibility for controlling all costs incurred and all payments made by the Australian federal government.


> $0.150 b – Australian Regulation – Income tax – Comprising:

~ $0.025 b – Australian Auditing Standards – Income tax

(currently “Auditing and Assurance Standards Board”)

~ $0.025 b – Australian Accounting Standards – Income tax

(currently “Australian Accounting Standards Board”)

~ $0.400 b – Australian Enterprise – Income tax

(i.e. regulation of all enterprise in Australia involving the transfer of money, including for-profit enterprise involving for-profit entities and not-for-profit enterprise involving not-for-profit entities, currently regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission)

~ $0.750 b – Australian Equity – Income tax

(incorporates the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) and current Departments of Fair Trading in Australian states and territories)

~ $0.200 b – Australian Insurance – Income tax

(i.e. regulation of the insurance industry only, currently regulated by the Australia Prudential Regulation Authority, not including regulation of the superannuation industry, for which Australian Superannuation is responsible, not including regulation of banks, credit unions, building societies and friendly societies, because after the publicly owned Australian Bank is established by the Australian federal government on behalf of Australian citizens, privately owned banks, credit unions, building societies and friendly societies will not be required and will therefore have their licences to operate revoked in due course by the Australian federal government)

[Abolish compulsory superannuation, which is confiscation of income earned by Australian citizens who are subject to compulsory superannuation and an attack on the property rights of Australian citizens over their income earned.

Employers do not make compulsory superannuation contributions on behalf of employees as gifts without receiving anything in return. Employees earn the superannuation that is paid by employers on their behalf via the work they perform as employees of employers. However, employees are generally not able to access and utilise the superannuation that is paid by employers on their behalf until they reach the preservation age, which is between 55 years of age and 60 years of age inclusive.

Therefore, compulsory superannuation is confiscation of income earned by Australian citizens who are subject to compulsory superannuation and an attack on the property rights of Australian citizens over their income earned.

Under the current rate of compulsory superannuation in Australia of 11.0%, this confiscation of income earned by Austrailan citizens who are subject to compulsory superannuation amounts to 9.9% (i.e. 11/111 x 100%) of their income earned.]

~ $0.150 b – Australian Communications – Income tax

(currently “Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA)”)

[One of the responsibilities of the Australian Communications Authority should be to operate an internet filter on all internet access in Australia, in order to protect Australian citizens from internet pornography, by blocking websites and web pages that contain internet pornography, on the basis that the production of pornography and the distribution of pornography should be criminalised in white countries around the world, including Australia, since freedom of speech only legitimately applies to the spoken or written word.]


> $0.000 b – Australian Water – Not-for-profit – User pays – Water bill

(i.e. water and sewerage)


> $0.000 b – Australian Electricity – Not-for-profit – User pays – Electricity bill

(currently privatised)


> $0.000 b – Australian Gas – Not-for-profit – User pays – Gas bill

(currently privatised)


> $0.000 b – Australian Telecommunications – Not-for-profit – User pays – Telecommunications bill

(currently privatised as “Telstra”) (including Internet telecommunications)


> $0.000 b – Australian Post – Not-for-profit – User pays – Postage cost


> $0.000 b – Australian Railways – Not-for-profit – User pays – Ticket cost and cargo cost (?)


> $0.000 b – Australian Buses – Not-for-profit – User pays – Ticket cost


> $0.000 b – Australian Airports – Not-for-profit – User pays – Unknown (?)

(currently privatised)


> $0.000 b – Australian Ports – Not-for-profit – User pays – Unknown (?)

(currently privatised)


> $0.500 b – Australian Emergency – Income tax

(i.e. rescue, disaster response (e.g. storms, floods, fires), fire fighting (which should be minimised by designating arson as a capital crime whose convicted perpetrators receive capital punishment involving death by hanging))


> $2.000 b – Australian Roads – Income tax

(i.e. maintenance and repairs of existing roads that are not the responsibility of Australian local government areas)


> $0.400 b – Australian Services – Income tax – Comprising:

~ $0.000 b – Australian Registry – Not-for-profit – User pays

(i.e. registration of births, deaths, marriages, divorces, adoptions, changes of names)

~ $0.400 b – Australian Identity – Income tax

Require that all Australian citizens obtain an Australian Identity Card (AIC) compulsorily which shows their photograph, full name, address, date of birth and Australian Identity Number (AIN), but which contains no electronically stored data, no biometric data and no other data of any type.

There should be no charge by Australian Identity on behalf of the Australian federal government to Australian citizens for obtaining an Australian Identity Card (AIC), on account of all Australian citizens being required to obtain an Australian Identity Card compulsorily, so that the cost of Australian Identity providing all Australian citizens with an Australian Identity Card on behalf of the Australian federal government is funded by income tax.

However, if any Australian citizen loses their Australian Identity Card (AIC) and is therefore required to replace it, they should be charged a fee for replacing their Australian Identity Card on a not-for-profit basis.

Require that all Australian citizens aged 18 years or over prove their identity using their Australian Identity Card (AIC) in order to be allowed to vote in Australian federal, state, territorial and local government elections, Australian referendums and Australian plebiscites.

~ $0.200 b – Australian Motor – Income tax – Comprising:

– $0.000 b – Australian Motor Licencing – Not-for-profit – User pays

(i.e. motor vehicle driver’s licencing)

– $0.000 b – Australian Motor Registration – Not-for-profit – User pays

(i.e. motor vehicle registration)

~ $0.100 b – Australian Maritime – Income tax – Comprising:

– $0.000 b – Australian Maritime Licencing – Not for profit – User pays

(i.e. maritime vessel driver’s licencing)

– $0.000 b – Australian Maritime Registration – Not for profit – User pays

(i.e. maritime vessel registration)

~ $0.100 b – Australian Titles – Income tax – Comprising:

– $0.000 b – Australian Land Titles – Not for-profit – User pays

(currently privatised)

– $0.000 b – Australian Residential Property Titles – Not for-profit – User pays

(currently privatised)

– $0.000 b – Australian Commercial Property Titles – Not for-profit – User pays

(currently privatised)


> $0.200 b – Australian Aviation – Income tax – Comprising:

~ $0.200 b – Australian Aviation Authority – Not-for-profit – Income tax

(currently “Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA)”)

~ $0.000 b – Australian Aviation Licencing – Not-for-profit – User pays

(i.e. aviation craft pilot licencing) (currently “Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA)”)

~ $0.000 b – Australian Aviation Registration – Not-for-profit – User pays

(i.e. aviation craft registration) (currently “Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA)”)

~ $0.000 b – Australian Aviation Control – Not-for-profit – User pays

(including air traffic control) (currrently “Airservices Australia”)


> $0.750 b – Australian Education – Income tax – Comprising:

~ $9.000 b – Australian Primary Schools – Income tax

The Australian federal government entity named Australian Primary Schools, comprising all public primary schools in Australia, should be funded via income tax so that Australian citizens whose children attend public primary schools in Australia do not pay any fees for the attendance of their children at public primary schools in Australia, particularly because it is compulsory for children in Australia to attend school in Australia up until the end of Year 10 in secondary school, as far as I am aware, when they have generally reached the age of 16 years.

(In my opinion, the Australian federal government should not provide any funding to private primary schools in Australia because they are not publicly owned or publicly operated.

In my opinion, public primary schools in Australia, where students have more autonomy and a stronger strong sense of self-determination, are superior to private primary schools in Australia, where students have less autonomy and a weaker sense of self-determination.)

~ $14.000 b – Australian Secondary Schools – Income tax

The Australian federal government entity named Australian Secondary Schools, comprising all public secondary schools in Australia, should be funded via income tax so that Australian citizens whose children attend public secondary schools in Australia do not pay any fees for the attendance of their children at public secondary schools in Australia, particularly because it is compulsory for children in Australia to attend school in Australia up until the end of Year 10 in secondary school, as far as I am aware, when they have generally reached the age of 16 years.

(In my opinion, the Australian federal government should not provide any funding to private secondary schools in Australia because they are not publicly owned or publicly operated.

In my opinion, public secondary schools in Australia, where students have more autonomy and a stronger strong sense of self-determination, are superior to private secondary schools in Australia, where students have less autonomy and a weaker sense of self-determination.)

~ $2.500 b – Australian TAFE – Not-for-profit – Half income tax, half user pays

(i.e. Australian TAFE colleges (Technical And Further Education))

The Australian federal government entity named Australian TAFE, comprising all public TAFE colleges in Australia, should be funded half by income tax and half by user pays, in order to motivate students at public TAFE colleges in Australia to work diligently to achieve good grades, particularly because it is not compulsory for Australian citizens to attend public TAFE colleges in Australia, so that Australian citizens who do not attend public TAFE colleges in Australia should not have to fund the full cost of Australian citizens who do attend public TAFE colleges in Australia attending public TAFE colleges in Australia via the income taxes they pay, although it is appropriate for Australian citizens who do not attend public TAFE colleges in Australia to fund half of the cost of Australian citizens who do attend public TAFE colleges in Australia attending public TAFE colleges in Australia via the income taxes they pay, because they benefit from the knowledge and skills that Australia citizens who do attend public TAFE colleges in Australia acquire as a result of attending public TAFE colleges in Australia, such as by receiving age pensions after they retire from working which are funded via income tax, which is partly paid by Australian citizens who have attended public TAFE colleges in Australia and who are working and paying income tax.

(In my opinion, the Australian federal government should not provide any funding to private colleges in Australia because they are not publicly owned or publicly operated.)

~ $2.500 b – Australian Universities – Not-for-profit – Half income tax, half user pays

The Australian federal government entity named Australian Universities, comprising all public universities in Australia, should be funded half by income tax and half by user pays, in order to motivate students at public universities in Australia to work diligently to achieve good grades, particularly because it is not compulsory for Australian citizens to attend public universities in Australia, so that Australian citizens who do not attend public universities in Australia should not have to fund the full cost of Australian citizens who do attend public universities in Australia attending public universities in Australia via the income taxes they pay, although it is appropriate for Australian citizens who do not attend public universities in Australia to fund half of the cost of Australian citizens who do attend public universities in Australia attending public universities in Australia via the income taxes they pay, because they benefit from the knowledge and skills that Australian citizens who do attend public universities in Australia acquire as a result of attending public universities in Australia, such as by receiving age pensions after they retire from working which are funded via income tax, which is partly paid by Australian citizens who have attended public universities in Australia and who are working and paying income tax.

(In my opinion, the Australian federal government should not provide any funding to private universities in Australia because they are not publicly owned or publicly operated.)


> $20.000 b – Australian Health – Not-for-profit – Income tax – User pays – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred

(i.e. doctors, dentists, hospitals)

The Australian federal government entity named Australian Health, comprising all public doctors in Australia, all public dentists in Australia and all public hospitals in Australia, should be funded by income tax and user pays and should be means-tested to minimise cost, in order to motivate Australian citizens to take good care of themselves, so as to avoid becoming sick and requiring care from public doctors in Australia, public dentists in Australia or public hospitals in Australia.

(In my opinion, the Australian federal government should not provide any funding to private doctors in Australia, private dentists in Australia or private hospitals in Australia because they are not publicly owned or publicly operated.)

[Eliminate the Medicare levy, so that spending on health by the Australian federal government is funded via income tax at a flat rate of 25% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over.]


> $0.200 b – Australian Environment – Income tax

(i.e. protection of the environment)


> $0.100 b – Australian Wildlife – Income tax

(i.e. humane management of wildlife, including appropriate protection of wildlife and appropriate killing of wildlife where necessary – preferably quick killing in order to prevent suffering of wildlife)


> $0.000 b – Australian Parks – Not-for-profit – User pays – Entry cost

(i.e. “national parks”)


> $0.075 b – Australian Agriculture – Income tax

(i.e. promotion of best practice in agriculture in Australia, dedicated to eliminating the growing of genetically modified food in Australia)


> $0.025 b – Australian Fisheries – Income tax

(i.e. promotion of best practice in fisheries in Australia)


> $0.050 b – Australian Timber – Income tax

(i.e. promotion of best practice in timber cultivation and timber production in Australia)


> $0.000 b – Australian Mining – Not-for-profit – User pays – Transfer prices of extracted resources, including natural gas, coal, iron ore, bauxite and copper sulfide, sold on a not-for-profit basis to other publicly owned Australian federal government entities, including natural gas and coal to Australian Electricity, for the production, distribution and sale of electricity, coal and iron ore to Australian Steel, for the production, distribution and sale of steel, bauxite to Australian Aluminium, for the production, distribution and sale of aluminium, copper sulfide to Australian Copper, for the production, distribution and sale of copper, et cetera.

(i.e. management of mining in Australia on behalf of Australian citizens who own the minerals in the ground in Australia, promotion of best practice in mining in Australia, which obviously excludes hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”))

The resources in the ground in Australia are owned by the Australian federal government on behalf of Australian citizens, not the mining companies which extract them.


> $0.000 b – Australian Steel – Not-for-profit – User pays

(i.e. publicly owned Australian federal government entity which is responsible for producing, distributing and selling steel across the entirety of Australia, charging Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities for the steel that it produces, distributes and sells on a not-for-profit basis)


> $0.000 b – Australian Aluminium – Not-for-profit – User pays

(i.e. publicly owned Australian federal government entity which is responsible for producing, distributing and selling aluminium across the entirety of Australia, charging Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities for the aluminium that it produces, distributes and sells on a not-for-profit basis)


> $0.000 b – Australian Copper – Not-for-profit – User pays

(i.e. publicly owned Australian federal government entity which is responsible for producing, distributing and selling copper across the entirety of Australia, charging Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities for the copper that it produces, distributes and sells on a not-for-profit basis)


> $0.000 b – Et cetera – Not-for-profit – User pays

(i.e. publicly owned Australian federal government entity which is responsible for producing, distributing and selling et cetera across the entirety of Australia, charging Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities for the et cetera that it produces, distributes and sells on a not-for-profit basis)


> $0.050 b – Australian Manufacturing – Income tax

(i.e. promotion of best practice in manufacturing in Australia)


> $0.500 b – Australian Welfare – Income tax – Comprising:

(currently “Centrelink”)

~ $0.250 b – Australian Veterans – Income tax – Comprising:

(i.e. Veteran Support, Veteran Payments)

– $0.250 b – Veteran Support – Income tax

(i.e. support for veterans)

– $7.000 b – Veteran Payments – Income tax – NOT means-tested under any circumstances

~ $0.500 b – Australian Elderly – Income tax – Comprising:

(i.e. Elderly Support, Elderly Payments (currently “Age Pensions”), Australian Elderly Care (currently “Aged care”))

– $0.500 b – Elderly Support – Income tax

(i.e. support for the elderly)

– $63.000 b – Elderly Payments – Income tax – NOT means-tested under any circumstances

(currently “Age Pensions”)

All Australian citizens over the age of eligibility for Elderly Payments should be treated equally by being paid the same amount of Elderly Payment WITHOUT means-testing, irrespective of their accumulated assets or incomes, whether high or low.

This is similar to the manner in which all Australian citizens aged 18 years or over should be treated equally by all being taxed at a flat rate of income tax of 25% on all of their earnings, by abolishing the tax-free threshold.

The age of eligibility for Elderly Payments in Australia should be reduced to 60 years, which would cause the annual cost of Elderly Payments WITHOUT means-testing to increase by approximately $10 billion from approximately $63 billion to approximately $73 billion.

Importantly, immigration into Australia causes inflation by increasing the size of the population of Australia and thereby increasing demand for goods and services (as well as assets), so that the prices of goods (e.g. groceries) and services (e.g. residential properties for rent) (as well as assets (e.g. residential properties)) increase, which pressures the Australian federal government to increase the amount of taxpayer funds it spends on welfare payments to Australian citizens receiving Veteran Payments, Elderly Payments, Disability Payments, Carer Payments, Child Carer Payments or Unemployment Payments, so that these Australian citizens can meet the increasing cost of living resulting from the inflation that immigration into Australia has caused by increasing the size of the population of Australia, which results in the Australian federal government increasing the amount of taxpayer funds it spends on welfare each year, comprising welfare payments to Australian citizens receiving Veteran Payments, Elderly Payments, Disability Payments, Carer Payments, Child Carer Payments or Unemployment Payments.

Therefore, the Australian federal government could reduce the annual cost of all welfare payments, by a minimum of 10% (i.e. approximately $10 billion) by reducing inflation in Australia via banning non-white immigration into Australia, deporting non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees) and offering non-white citizens of Australia, obviously with the exception of indigenous, Aboriginal Australian citizens, amounts of money, such as $7,500 for adults and $2,500 for minors, to voluntarily relinquish their Australian citizenship and return to their countries of origin, in order to reduce demand for goods (e.g. groceries) and services (e.g. residential properties for rent) (as well as assets (e.g. residential properties)), thereby causing the prices of goods (e.g. groceries) and services (e.g. residential properties for rent) (as well as assets (e.g. residential properties)) to decrease, thereby enabling the Australian federal government to reduce the size of all welfare payments that eligible Australian citizens receive.

This reduction in the cost of all welfare payments, via banning non-white immigration into Australia, deporting non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees (with the exception of genuine refugees) back to their countries of origin and non-white non-citizens of Australia, obviously with the exception of indigenous, Aboriginal Australian citizens, amounts of money to voluntarily relinquish their Australian citizenship and return to their countries of origin, could be used to fund a reduction in the age of eligibility for Elderly Payments in Australia to 60 years.

– $13.500 b – Elderly Care – Not-for-profit – Income tax – User pays – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred

(currently “Aged care”)

~ $0.500 b – Australian Disability – Income tax – Comprising:

(i.e. Disability Support, Disability Payments (currently “Disability Support Pensions”), Disability Scheme (currently “National Disability Insurance Scheme (“NDIS”)))

– $0.500 b – Disability Support – Income tax

(i.e. support for the disabled)

– $17.000 b – Disability Payments (currently “Disability Support Pensions”) – Income tax – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred

– $12.500 b – Disability Scheme – Not-for-profit – Income tax – User pays – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred

(currently “National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS)”)

The Australian federal government should diligently reduce wasteful spending associated with the Disability Scheme (currently “National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS)”), in order to minimise the cost of the Disability Scheme, while ensuring that the Disability Scheme provides worthwhile services to legitimate, disabled recipients.

~ $0.250 b – Australian Carers – Income tax – Comprising:

(i.e. Carer Support, Carer Payments)

– $0.250 b – Carer Support

(i.e. support for carers)

– $10.000 b – Carer Payments – Income tax – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred

~ $0.500 b – Australian Children – Income tax – Comprising:

(i.e. Child Protection, Child Support, Child Carer Payments (currently “Child Care Subsidy”))

– $0.500 b – Child Protection – Income tax

(i.e. protection of children)

– $0.500 b – Child Support – Income tax

(i.e. support for children)

– $10.000 b – Child Carer Payments – Income tax – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred

(currently “Child Care Subsidy”)

[The Family Tax Benefit, costing circa $18 billion per year, should be eliminated because the Australian federal government cannot afford the Family Tax Benefit.]

~ $0.500 b – Australian Unemployed – Income tax – Comprising:

(i.e. Unemployment Support, Unemployment Payments (currently “JobSeeker Payments”))

– $0.500 b – Unemployment Support – Income tax

(i.e. support for the unemployed)

– $14.000 b – Unemployment Payments – Income tax – NOT means-tested in relation to accumulated assets

(currently “JobSeeker Payments”)

All Australian citizens eligible for Unemployment Payments should be treated equally by being paid the same amount of Unemployment Payment WITHOUT means-testing, irrespective of their accumulated assets, including bank deposits, whether high or low.

This is similar to the manner in which all Australian citizens aged 18 years or over should be treated equally by all being taxed at a flat rate of income tax of 25% on all of their earnings, by abolishing the tax-free threshold.


aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/BudgetReview202021/SocialSecurityWelfare


Importantly, immigration into Australia causes inflation by increasing the size of the population of Australia and thereby increasing demand for goods and services (as well as assets), so that the prices of goods (e.g. groceries) and services (e.g. residential properties for rent) (as well as assets (e.g. residential properties)) increase, which pressures the Australian federal government to increase the amount of taxpayer funds it spends on welfare payments to Australian citizens receiving Veteran Payments, Elderly Payments, Disability Payments, Carer Payments, Child Carer Payments or Unemployment Payments, so that these Australian citizens can meet the increasing cost of living resulting from the inflation that immigration into Australia has caused by increasing the size of the population of Australia, which results in the Australian federal government increasing the amount of taxpayer funds it spends on welfare each year, comprising welfare payments to Australian citizens receiving Veteran Payments, Elderly Payments, Disability Payments, Carer Payments, Child Carer Payments or Unemployment Payments.

Therefore, the Australian federal government could reduce the annual cost of all welfare payments, by a minimum of 10% (i.e. approximately $10 billion) by reducing inflation in Australia via banning non-white immigration into Australia, deporting non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees) and offering non-white citizens of Australia, obviously with the exception of indigenous, Aboriginal Australian citizens, amounts of money, such as $7,500 for adults and $2,500 for minors, to voluntarily relinquish their Australian citizenship and return to their countries of origin, in order to reduce demand for goods (e.g. groceries) and services (e.g. residential properties for rent) (as well as assets (e.g. residential properties)), thereby causing the prices of goods (e.g. groceries) and services (e.g. residential properties for rent) (as well as assets (e.g. residential properties)) to decrease, thereby enabling the Australian federal government to reduce the size of all welfare payments that eligible Australian citizens receive.

This reduction in the cost of all welfare payments, via banning non-white immigration into Australia, deporting non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees (with the exception of genuine refugees) back to their countries of origin and non-white non-citizens of Australia, obviously with the exception of indigenous, Aboriginal Australian citizens, amounts of money to voluntarily relinquish their Australian citizenship and return to their countries of origin, could be used to fund a reduction in the age of eligibility for Elderly Payments in Australia to 60 years.


> Up to $40.800 b – Australian Infrastructure – Income tax

(i.e. delivery of all strictly necessary infrastructure projects (such as the construction of new government buildings, roads, schools, universities, hospitals, railway lines, dams, power stations and ports))

(The annual budget of Australian Infrastructure of up to $40.800 billion (i.e. a maximum of $40.800 billion) can be preserved by reducing wasteful or unnecessary spending on the primary functions of the Australian federal government, as I have defined them notionally in this list of proposed Australian federal goverment services, apart from all welfare payments, which primary functions of the Australian federal government should ideally cost approximately $105 billion per year, in order to free up income tax to allocate to the annual budget of Australian Infrastructure, thereby preserving the annual budget of Australian Infrastructure.

It is possible to reduce salaries and wages paid to Australian federal government employees who carry out the primary functions of the Australian federal government, as I have defined them notionally in this list of proposed Australian federal goverment services, to more realistic levels, such as by linking the amounts paid in salaries and wages to these Australian federal government employees to the performance of these Australian federal government employees.

It is possible to reduce wasteful expenditure on capital items, such as unnecessary upgrades to Australian federal government facilities, computer equipment and office fittings, so that a suitable return on investment is obtained from existing capital items, such as existing Australian federal government facilities, computer equipment and office fittings, by seeking to maximise the service lives of existing capital items within reason.

The annual budget of Australian Infrastructure of up to $40.800 billion (i.e. a maximum of $40.800 billion) can also be preserved by way of the Australian federal government diligently administering the integrity and means testing of the payments associated with Australian Elderly Care, Australian Disability Support (currently “National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS)”), Australian Elderly (i.e. Elderly Payments), Australian Disability (i.e. Disability Payments), Australian Carers (i.e. Carer Payments), Australian Children (i.e. Child Carer Payments) and Australian Unemployed (i.e. Unemployment Payments), in order to free up income tax to allocate to the annual budget of Australian Infrastructure, thereby preserving the annual budget of Australian Infrastructure.)

Once a strictly necessary infrastructure project is identified, the Australian federal government should ensure that it spends enough on it and no more, in order to ensure that a high-quality outcome is delivered that will provide value to taxpayers, by minimising the construction cost of the strictly necessary infrastructure project divided by its useful life in years until it is obsolete and it is no longer of any service to Australian citizens.

The amount of taxpayer funds, in the form of income tax, that is spent on the delivery of all strictly necessary infrastructure projects, should be minimised to the greatest extent possible, in order to free up taxpayer funds, in the form of income tax, for repayment of unspent income tax at the end of each financial year in good faith to each taxpayer who has paid income tax during the financial year, in proportion to the amount of income tax paid by each taxpayer during the financial year, in order to minimise the amount of income tax paid by each taxpayer who has paid income tax during the financial year.


> $0.800 b – Australian State – Income tax

(i.e. external relations)


> $0.400 b – Australian Trade – Income tax


> $0.150 b – Australian Migration – Income tax – Comprising:

~ $1.000 b – Australian Deportation – Half user pays, half income tax

(i.e. deport non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees), numbering in the order of four (4) million, back to their countries of origin)

(Genuine refugees are from Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria, as a result of the unjustified wars in these countries, in which the Australian Defence Force was unjustifiably involved against the publicly expressed wishes of Australian citizens in early 2003 before the Iraq war commenced, thereby imposing a moral obligation on Australian citizens to accept refugees from Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria as a result of the unjustified wars in these countries.

The unjustified Vietnam war was likely intended to create Vietnamese refugees and influence them to immigrate to Australia and other white countries around the world, in order to kick-start the nefarious agenda of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan of multiculturalism in white countries around the world.

Obviously I believe that the citizenship of Vietnamese citizens of white countries around the world, including Australia, who immigrated to Australia as Vietnamese refugees as a result of the Vietnam war or who are descended from Vietnamese refugees who immigrated to Australia as a result of the Vietnam war, should be respected by white citizens of white countries around the world, including Australia.

Vietnamese people, including Vietnamese citizens of white countries around the world, are some of the most hard-working and capable people on the entire planet.

Policy on accepting refugees into Australia should include Australia not participating in unjustified wars that create refugees and impose a moral obligation on Australia to accept refugees into Australia, such as World War I, World War II, the Korean war, the Vietnam war, the Afghanistan war, the Iraq war and the Syrian war, helping refugees in their country of origin where possible and not accepting refugees into Australia involuntarily unless Australia has a moral obligation to do so, on account of participating in unjustified wars in their countries of origin.)


The current ethnic composition and citizenship composition of Australia is estimated to be as follows:

100% – Population of Australia – 26.8 million
34% – White (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 9.1 million
3% – Aboriginal (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 0.8 million
24% – Non-white (predominantly) – Citizens of Australia – 6.5 million
15% – Non-white (predominantly) – Non-citizens of Australia – 4.0 million
24% – Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) (predominantly) – Citizens of Australia – 6.4 million


The budget for Australian Deportation of $1.000 billion each year from income tax will enable more than 2 million non-white non-citizens of Australia to be deported back to their countries of origin each year, because the funding for Australian Deportation will be half user pays and half income tax.

Deporting non-citizens of Australia, numbering in the order of four (4) million, back to their countries of origin, with the exception of genuine refugees, will ensure that white Australian citizens will once again be the largest ethnic group in Australia.

Deporting non-citizens of Australia, numbering in the order of four (4) million, back to their countries of origin will reduce the size of the population of Australia from its current approximately 27 million people to approximately 23 million people, thereby significantly reducing demand for residential properties (i.e. housing) and thereby causing rents for residential properties and prices of residential properties to decrease, while freeing up a large number of residential properties for Australian citizens to occupy, instead of the circa four (4) million non-citizens of Australia who are currently living in Australia.

Deporting non-citizens of Australia, numbering in the order of four (4) million, back to their countries of origin will also reduce the supply of labour in Australia, causing salaries and wages of Australian citizens to increase and unemployment in Australia to decrease, as well as reduce congestion on the roads in Australia, congestion on public transport in Australia and congestion in general in Australia.

~ $3.500 b – Australian Repatriation – Income tax

(repatriate: “to send a person back to the country of his or her birth or citizenship”)

Offer non-white citizens of Australia, obviously with the exception of indigenous, Aboriginal Australian citizens, amounts of money, such as $7,500 AUD for adults and $2,500 AUD for minors, to voluntarily relinquish their Australian citizenship and return to their countries of origin.


The current ethnic composition and citizenship composition of Australia is estimated to be as follows:

100% – Population of Australia – 26.8 million
34% – White (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 9.1 million
3% – Aboriginal (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 0.8 million
24% – Non-white (predominantly) – Citizens of Australia – 6.5 million
15% – Non-white (predominantly) – Non-citizens of Australia – 4.0 million
24% – Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) (predominantly) – Citizens of Australia – 6.4 million


The budget for Australian Repatriation of $3.5 billion each year from income tax will enable the repatriation of at least 500,000 non-white citizens of Australia each year, involving them voluntarily relinquishing their Australian citizenship and returning to their countries of origin.

~ $0.025 b – Australian Immigration – Half user pays, half income tax

Ban immigration of non-white people into Australia.

Ban immigration of white people who cannot read and write English into Australia, since it will not be readily possible for them to learn to speak English in Australia.

Only allow immigration of white people who can read and write English into Australia, since it will be readily possible for them to learn to speak English in Australia.

Immigration into Australia is not always beneficial to Australian citizens.

Anybody who states that immigration into Australia is always beneficial to Australian citizens is either ignorant or deliberately dishonest.

Immigration into Australia causes inflation by increasing the size of the population of Australia and thereby increasing demand for goods, services and assets, so that the prices of goods (e.g. groceries), services (e.g. residential properties for rent) and assets (e.g. residential properties) increase.

Non-white immigration into Australia involving non-white immigrants originating from non-white countries around the world, including Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Nepal, China, other Asian countries and Pacific Island countries, should be banned.

Immigration into Australia should be limited to predominantly white citizens originating from white countries around the world (not predominantly Jewish (i.e. predominantly Edomitish) citizens originating from white countries around the world), who can read and write English (since it will therefore be readily possible for them to learn to speak English in Australia), including the following white countries around the world (whose estimated populations are shown):

Ireland – 5 million
Northern Ireland – 2 million
Scotland – 5 million
England – 56 million
Wales – 3 million
France – 67 million
Belgium – 11 million
Netherlands – 17 million
Germany – 83 million
Switzerland – 10 million
Liechtenstein – less than 1 million
Austria – 9 million
Czech Republic – 11 million
Poland – 38 million
Lithuania – 3 million
Latvia – 2 million
Estonia – 1 million
Finland – 6 million
Sweden – 10 million
Norway – 5 million
Denmark – 6 million
Iceland – less than 1 million
Ukraine – 41 million
Russia – 146 million
United States of America – 331 million
Canada – 38 million
Australia – 26 million
New Zealand – 5 million


In any given financial year, from 1st July to the following 30th June, one year later, immigration into Australia over the course of that financial year should not exceed 0.10% of the number of Australian citizens living in Australia at the start of that financial year.

For example, if the number of Australian citizens living in Australia at the start of any given financial year is 23 million, then immigration into Australia over the course of that financial year should not exceed 0.10% of 23 million, being 23,000 people.

Australia – Population and Demographic Data – 1900 to 2022



Following is a list of proposed Australian local government services, together with their proposed sources of funding:

> Australian Local Governments – Local government rates

(e.g. “Brisbane City Council”)

> Australian Local Governments – Environment – Local government rates

(e.g. “Brisbane City Council – Environment”)

> Australian Local Governments – Planning – Partly local government rates, partly local government fees

(e.g. “Brisbane City Council – Planning”)

> Australian Local Governments – Facilities – Partly local government rates, partly local government fees

(e.g. “Brisbane City Council – Facilities”) (i.e. community centres, pools)

> Australian Local Governments – Rubbish & Recycling – Partly local government rates, partly local government fees

(e.g. “Brisbane City Council – Rubbish & Recycling”) (i.e. rubbish & recycling collection)

> Australian Local Governments – Parks – Local government rates

(e.g. “Brisbane City Council – Parks”) (i.e. parks, cemeteries)

> Australian Local Governments – Paths – Local government rates

(e.g. “Brisbane City Council – Paths”) (i.e. footpaths, cycleways)

> Australian Local Governments – Roads – Local government rates

(e.g. “Brisbane City Council – Roads”)



Top



Condensed lists of proposed Australian federal government services and proposed Australian local government services…


Following is a condensed list of proposed Australian federal government services, together with their estimated annual budgets from income tax in billions (b) of dollars (i.e. thousands of millions of dollars) and their proposed sources of funding:


(Excluding “Australian Infrastructure”, the total estimated annual budget in billions of dollars, funded via income tax, of the proposed Australian federal government services in the following list is $242.180 billion.

Including “Australian Infrastructure”, which has an estimated annual budget of up to $40.800 billion (i.e. a maximum of $40.800 billion), the total estimated annual budget in billions of dollars, funded via income tax, of the proposed Australian federal government services in the following list is up to $282.980 billion (i.e. a maximum of $282.980 billion).)


> $0.200 b – Australian Discussion – Income tax

> $0.500 b – Australian Audit – Income tax

> $0.050 b – Australian Reporting – Income tax

> $0.050 b – Australian Elections – Income tax – Comprising:
~ $0.150 b – Australian Federal Government Elections – Income tax
~ $0.150 b – Australian Federal Government Referendums – Income tax
~ $0.100 b – Australian Local Government Elections – Income tax

> $0.050 b – Australian Parliament – Income tax – Comprising:
~ $0.050 b – Australian Parliament Services – Income tax
~ $0.020 b – Australian Parliament Analysis – Income tax
~ $0.750 b – Australian Forum of Representatives – Income tax
~ $0.025 b – Australian Forum of Representatives Services – Income tax

> $0.150 b – Australian Prime Minister and Cabinet – Income tax

> $0.400 b – Australian Attorney-General – Income tax

> $10.000 b – Australian Police Force – Income tax

> $1.000 b – Australian Judiciary – Income tax

> $0.010 b – Australian Execution – Income tax

> $1.500 b – Australian Prisons – Income tax

> $1.000 b – Australian Border Force – Income tax

> $0.750 b – Australian Detention – Income tax

> $10.000 b – Australian Defence Force – Income tax

> $0.000 b – Australian Bank – Not-for-profit – User pays – Account-keeping fees and transaction fees

> $0.050 b – Australian Treasury – Income tax – Comprising:
~ $0.750 b – Australian Taxation – Income tax
~ $0.200 b – Australian Statistics – Income tax
~ $0.050 b – Australian Analysis – Income tax
~ $0.050 b – Australian Productivity – Income tax
~ $0.050 b – Australian Management – Income tax

> $0.150 b – Australian Regulation – Income tax – Comprising:
~ $0.025 b – Australian Auditing Standards – Income tax
~ $0.025 b – Australian Accounting Standards – Income tax
~ $0.400 b – Australian Enterprise – Income tax
~ $0.750 b – Australian Equity – Income tax
~ $0.200 b – Australian Insurance – Income tax
~ $0.150 b – Australian Communications – Income tax

> $0.000 b – Australian Water – Not-for-profit – User pays – Water bill

> $0.000 b – Australian Electricity – Not-for-profit – User pays – Electricity bill

> $0.000 b – Australian Gas – Not-for-profit – User pays – Gas bill

> $0.000 b – Australian Telecommunications – Not-for-profit – User pays – Telecommunications bill

> $0.000 b – Australian Post – Not-for-profit – User pays – Postage cost

> $0.000 b – Australian Railways – Not-for-profit – User pays – Ticket cost and cargo cost (?)

> $0.000 b – Australian Buses – Not-for-profit – User pays – Ticket cost

> $0.000 b – Australian Airports – Not-for-profit – User pays – Unknown (?)

> $0.000 b – Australian Ports – Not-for-profit – User pays – Unknown (?)

> $0.500 b – Australian Emergency – Income tax

> $2.000 b – Australian Roads – Income tax

> $0.400 b – Australian Services – Income tax – Comprising:
~ $0.000 b – Australian Registry – Not-for-profit – User pays
~ $0.400 b – Australian Identity – Income tax
~ $0.200 b – Australian Motor – Income tax – Comprising:
– $0.000 b – Australian Motor Licencing – Not-for-profit – User pays
– $0.000 b – Australian Motor Registration – Not-for-profit – User pays
~ $0.100 b – Australian Maritime – Income tax – Comprising:
– $0.000 b – Australian Maritime Licencing – Not for profit – User pays
– $0.000 b – Australian Maritime Registration – Not for profit – User pays
~ $0.100 b – Australian Titles – Income tax – Comprising:
– $0.000 b – Australian Land Titles – Not for-profit – User pays
– $0.000 b – Australian Residential Property Titles – Not for-profit – User pays
– $0.000 b – Australian Commercial Property Titles – Not for-profit – User pays

> $0.200 b – Australian Aviation – Income tax – Comprising:
~ $0.200 b – Australian Aviation Authority – Not-for-profit – Income tax
~ $0.000 b – Australian Aviation Licencing – Not-for-profit – User pays
~ $0.000 b – Australian Aviation Registration – Not-for-profit – User pays
~ $0.000 b – Australian Aviation Control – Not-for-profit – User pays

> $0.750 b – Australian Education – Income tax – Comprising:
~ $9.000 b – Australian Primary Schools – Income tax
~ $14.000 b – Australian Secondary Schools – Income tax
~ $2.500 b – Australian TAFE – Not-for-profit – Half income tax, half user pays
~ $2.500 b – Australian Universities – Not-for-profit – Half income tax, half user pays

> $20.000 b – Australian Health – Not-for-profit – Income tax – User pays – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred

> $0.200 b – Australian Environment – Income tax

> $0.100 b – Australian Wildlife – Income tax

> $0.000 b – Australian Parks – Not-for-profit – User pays – Entry cost

> $0.075 b – Australian Agriculture – Income tax

> $0.025 b – Australian Fisheries – Income tax

> $0.050 b – Australian Timber – Income tax

> $0.000 b – Australian Mining – Not-for-profit – User pays – Transfer prices of extracted resources, including natural gas, coal, iron ore, bauxite and copper sulfide, sold on a not-for-profit basis to other publicly owned Australian federal government entities, including natural gas and coal to Australian Electricity, for the production, distribution and sale of electricity, coal and iron ore to Australian Steel, for the production, distribution and sale of steel, bauxite to Australian Aluminium, for the production, distribution and sale of aluminium, copper sulfide to Australian Copper, for the production, distribution and sale of copper, et cetera.

> $0.000 b – Australian Steel – Not-for-profit – User pays

> $0.000 b – Australian Aluminium – Not-for-profit – User pays

> $0.000 b – Australian Copper – Not-for-profit – User pays

> $0.000 b – Et cetera – Not-for-profit – User pays

> $0.050 b – Australian Manufacturing – Income tax

> $0.500 b – Australian Welfare – Income tax – Comprising:
~ $0.250 b – Australian Veterans – Income tax – Comprising:
– $0.250 b – Veteran Support – Income tax
– $7.000 b – Veteran Payments – Income tax – NOT means-tested under any circumstances
~ $0.500 b – Australian Elderly – Income tax – Comprising:
– $0.500 b – Elderly Support – Income tax
– $63.000 b – Elderly Payments – Income tax – NOT means-tested under any circumstances
– $13.500 b – Elderly Care – Not-for-profit – Income tax – User pays – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred
~ $0.500 b – Australian Disability – Income tax – Comprising:
– $0.500 b – Disability Support – Income tax
– $17.000 b – Disability Payments (currently “Disability Support Pensions”) – Income tax – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred
– $12.500 b – Disability Scheme – Not-for-profit – Income tax – User pays – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred
~ $0.250 b – Australian Carers – Income tax – Comprising:
– $0.250 b – Carer Support
– $10.000 b – Carer Payments – Income tax – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred
~ $0.500 b – Australian Children – Income tax – Comprising:
– $0.500 b – Child Protection – Income tax
– $0.500 b – Child Support – Income tax
– $10.000 b – Child Carer Payments – Income tax – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred
~ $0.500 b – Australian Unemployed – Income tax – Comprising:
– $0.500 b – Unemployment Support – Income tax
– $14.000 b – Unemployment Payments – Income tax – NOT means-tested in relation to accumulated assets

> Up to $40.800 b – Australian Infrastructure – Income tax

> $0.800 b – Australian State – Income tax

> $0.400 b – Australian Trade – Income tax

> $0.150 b – Australian Migration – Income tax – Comprising:
~ $1.000 b – Australian Deportation – Half user pays, half income tax
~ $3.500 b – Australian Repatriation – Income tax
~ $0.025 b – Australian Immigration – Half user pays, half income tax


Following is a condensed list of proposed Australian local government services, together with their proposed sources of funding:

> Australian Local Governments – Local government rates

> Australian Local Governments – Environment – Local government rates

> Australian Local Governments – Planning – Partly local government rates, partly local government fees

> Australian Local Governments – Facilities – Partly local government rates, partly local government fees

> Australian Local Governments – Rubbish & Recycling – Partly local government rates, partly local government fees

> Australian Local Governments – Parks – Local government rates

> Australian Local Governments – Paths – Local government rates

> Australian Local Governments – Roads – Local government rates


For example:

> Brisbane City Council – Local government rates

> Brisbane City Council – Environment – Local government rates

> Brisbane City Council – Planning – Partly local government rates, partly local government fees

> Brisbane City Council – Facilities – Partly local government rates, partly local government fees

> Brisbane City Council – Rubbish & Recycling – Rubbish & Recycling – Partly local government rates, partly local government fees

> Brisbane City Council – Parks – Local government rates

> Brisbane City Council – Paths – Local government rates

> Brisbane City Council – Roads – Local government rates



Top



The only tax should be income tax.


> Abolish all capital gains tax (CGT) in Australia, since it is a highly offensive violation of property rights of Australian citizens and Australian entities over assets exhibiting capital gains.

Capital gains tax in Australia constitutes less than 10% of all tax revenue collected in Australia by the Australian federal, state and territorial governments.

In fact, the percentage of total tax revenue collected that is attributable to capital gains tax is so small that I have not been able to find out what this percentage actually is on any Australian federal government website. The Australian federal government has deliberately concealed this information from Australian citizens and Australian entities.

The Australian federal government does not levy capital gains tax on Australian citizens and Australian entities because it needs tax revenue from capital gains tax. The Australian federal government levies capital gains tax on Australian citizens and Australian entities only because it does not want them to have the full capital gains to which they are legitimately entitled. Capital gains do not constitute income and should not be taxed under any circumstances.

Capital gains tax is in direct opposition to property rights and should be abolished. With capital gains tax in force, if somebody saves up some money and then invests it in shares (or any asset), they quite obviously don’t have full property rights to the asset they purchase, because if they later sell this asset for more than they paid for it, the government wants a cut of the capital gain via capital gains tax. If they have full property rights to the asset they purchase, they could sell it and keep the full amount they receive for it without paying any capital gains tax.

Somebody who trades shares in order to make capital gains and who then withdraws a portion of their accumulated capital, in order to fund their living expenses, does not earn any income and should not be taxed on the capital gains they make. Instead, they are consuming a portion of the capital they have accumulated, in order to fund their living expenses. (However, any dividends they receive from any shares that they own do constitute income and should be subject to income tax, which is currently the case.)


> Abolish the Goods & Services Tax (GST), since the Goods & Services Tax (GST) constitutes double-taxation of income on which income tax has already been paid.

The Australian federal government wasn’t satisfied with the income tax that citizens paid on their earnings.  It wanted more.  So, on 1st July, 2000, it introduced the Goods & Services Tax (GST) to tax the income that the citizenry have left after they’ve already paid income tax, which is an attack on the property rights of the citizenry over this remaining income. The citizenry earn income and are obligated to pay income tax to the government to fund their common needs.  One would hope that they have property rights over their remaining income, but no!  The government wants more and the citizenry are on the hook for 1/11 in GST (i.e. 10/110) of all of the goods and services they purchase with their after-tax income.


> Abolish all business taxes on business profits, since business profits are taxed after they are paid to the owners of the businesses via income tax, including dividends paid out of company profits to shareholders of companies.

There should be no taxes on the profits of businesses (i.e. sole traders, partnerships, companies, corporations, et cetera), which are distributed to the citizens who own the businesses (i.e. proprietors, partners, shareholders, et cetera) as income of those citizens. That income should then be subject to income tax. This means that the profits of businesses, which are distributed to the citizens who own the businesses, are only taxed once as income of the citizens who own the businesses.


> Abolish fuel tax, since everybody in society benefits from roads and the transport of goods that they make possible, including those who don’t drive motor vehicles, so that roads should be paid for out of income tax.  Just like the Goods & Services Tax (GST), fuel tax is double taxation of income since it’s paid for by the citizenry out of their after-tax income.


> Abolish all other Australian federal government taxes, including the Medicare levy, with the exception of income tax.



Top



How to repay all Australian federal, state and territorial government debts in five years or less…


> Fund the Australian federal, state and territorial governments via income tax collected by the Australian federal government at a flat rate of income tax of 25% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over, by abolishing the tax-free threshold and abolishing compulsory superannuation, so that compulsory superannuation contributions made by employers on behalf of employees, which constitute income earned by employees, since employers do not make compulsory superannuation contributions on behalf of employees as gifts to employees, are taxed as income earned at a flat rate of income tax of 25%, instead of the current rate of tax on compulsory superannuation contributions of 15%, thereby adding circa $28.1 billion (i.e. (0.11 x 0.25) / 0.25 x $255 billion) to income tax collected by the Australian federal government, instead of the current circa $16.8 billion (i.e. (0.11 x 0.15) / 0.25 x $255 billion) under the current rate of tax on compulsory superannuation contributions of 15%, amounting to a total of circa $283.1 billion per year in income tax revenue.


> Identify any Australian federal government debt which is not legitimate debt.


> Tax the superannuation balances of Australian citizens of circa $3,500 billion#, comprising compulsory superannuation contributions, not voluntary superannuation contributions, which compulsory superannuation contributions effectively constitute income earned, at a flat rate of ad hoc tax, in order to repay all legitimate Australian federal government debt (as opposed to illegitimate Australian federal government debt) up to the amount of the current Australian federal government debt, which is circa $1,150 billion^.

# en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superannuation_in_Australia (third paragraph)

^ australiandebtclock.com.au (“National Government Debt”, one-third of the way down the web page)


> Once the Australian federal government debt has been repaid, ban the Australian federal government from incurring Australian federal government debt.


> Identify any Australian state and territorial government debts which are not legitimate debts.

For example, identify any Victoria state government debt which is not legitimate debt.


> Maintain all Australian state and territorial government taxes and use them pragmatically for the exclusive purpose of repaying all legitimate Australian state and territorial government debts (as opposed to illegitimate Australian state and territorial government debts).

For example, maintain all existing Victoria state government taxes and use them pragmatically for the exclusive purpose of repaying all legitimate Victoria state government debt (as opposed to illegitimate Victoria state government debt).


> Once the Australian state and territorial government debts have been repaid, ban the Australian state and territorial governments from incurring Australian state and territorial government debts.

For example, once the Victoria state government debt has been repaid, ban the Victoria state government from incurring Victoria state government debt.


> Once the Australian state and territorial governments have been banned from incurring Australian state and territorial government debts, abolish all Australian state and territorial government taxes.

For example, once the Victoria state government has been banned from incurring Victoria state government debt, abolish all Victoria state government taxes.



Top



Abolish the Australian state and territorial governments so that only the Australian federal government and Australian local governments remain.


Hold an Australian referendum on abolishing Australian state and territorial governments so that only the Australian federal government and Australian local governments remain, while retaining Australian states and territories (with the exception of the Australian Capital Territory) as geographic entities, referred to as “Australian territories”, in order to facilitate Australian federal governmental administration.

The buildings currently occupied by Australian state and territorial governments in the Australian states and territories and currently used by Australian state and territorial governments for Australian state and territorial governmental administration and Australian state and territorial governmental service delivery to Australian citizens in the Australian states and territories can be occupied as necessary by the Australian federal government in the Australian states and territories and used as necessary by the Australian federal government for Australian federal governmental administration and Australian federal governmental service delivery to Australian citizens in the Australian states and territories.

The existence of Australian state and territorial governments is an obstacle that prevents the Australian federal government and Australian local governments from operating effectively and efficiently in the best interests of Australian citizens.

For example, it would obviously be preferable if there was only one property titles system covering the entirety of Australia, administered by the Australian federal government, instead of a separate property titles system for each Australian state and territory, administered by each Australian state and territorial government.

It is also much easier for some 23 million Australian citizens to oppose and change the policies of the Australian federal government that they don’t like, than it is for some 23 million Australian citizens to oppose and change the policies of the Australian federal government and eight Australian state and territorial governments that they don’t like.



Top



Move the Australian federal government from southern New South Wales to southern Queensland.


Hold an Australian referendum on establishing a new territory for the Australian federal government to occupy in southern Queensland, such as the region surrounding Milora, Queensland, west-northwest of the Gold Coast, Queensland and southwest of Brisbane, Queensland, with a new name, such as the “Australian Territory”, on account of the climate in the existing Australian Capital Territory in southern New South Wales being too cold to enable the machinery of the Australian federal government to operate effectively and efficiently, so that after a new territory for the Australian federal government to occupy is established in southern Queensland and the Australian federal government is moved from the existing Australian Capital Territory in southern New South Wales to the new territory for the Australian federal government to occupy in southern Queensland, the existing Australian Capital Territory in southern New South Wales should be abolished, divided into one or more Australian local government areas and absorbed into New South Wales.

google.com/maps/place/Australian+Capital+Territory/@-35.2142438,149.109906,183838m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m6!3m5!1s0x6b164cdfa09b104b:0xe75844385c6e7803!8m2!3d-35.4734679!4d149.0123679!16zL20vMHZoMw?entry=ttu

google.com/maps/place/Milora+QLD+4309/@-27.5883049,152.7118932,182533m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m6!3m5!1s0x6b96d04a40c76e21:0x400eef17f20e4b0!8m2!3d-27.8479975!4d152.6838612!16s%2Fg%2F11f3jyb948?entry=ttu



Top



Other improvements to make to Australia so that it functions properly…


> Australian citizens have little say in the direction in which the Australian federal government takes Australia and have had little say for decades.

Australian citizens urgently need a formal, structured mechanism for voicing their opinions to the Australian federal government about policy, legislation and issues that necessarily affect their interests as Australian citizens and the health of Australia.

In the interests of protecting and enhancing democracy in Australia, the Australian federal government should operate a discussion forum on the internet, named “Australian Discussion”, as an Australian federal government service to Australian citizens, which is exclusively concerned with Australian federal government policy, legislation and issues, that necessarily affect the interests of Australian citizens and the health of Australia as a nation, so that Australian citizens can participate in such a discussion forum on the internet, in order to provide their views in good faith on Australian federal government policy, legislation and issues and discuss Australian federal government policy, legislation and issues with other Australian citizens, as a means of effectively and efficiently informing elected representatives in the Australian federal government and Australian federal government employees in the Australian federal government services of the views of Australian citizens regarding Australian federal government policy, legislation and issues.

Since such a discussion forum on the internet would be operated by the Australian federal government, Australian citizens would hopefully be motivated to participate in good faith and ensure that the views they put forward and the discussions they conduct conform to high standards of integrity.

Obviously, it would be in the best interests of Australian citizens participating in such a discussion forum on the internet to put forward their views and conduct discussions in the best possible manner, in order to convince other Australian citizens participating in such a discussion forum on the internet to adopt their views.

However, by enabling Australian citizens to discuss Australian federal government policy, legislation and issues with each other, such a discussion forum on the internet would provide Australian citizens with opportunities to learn from the views of other Australian citizens about Australian federal government policy, legislation and issues and adjust their own views when they realise that the views of other Australian citizens better serve the interests of Australian citizens and the health of Australia as a nation.

The website for Australian Discussion should be “australian-discussion.gov.au”.


> I wonder whether the salaries and wages paid to employees of Australian federal government services (i.e. “Australian Public Service”), particularly at the executive levels up to secretary, are high enough to attract Australian citizens of sufficient quality, talent and skill to work for Australian federal government services, such as by relocating to Canberra, where around 40% of employees of the Australian federal government services work and where it is very cold for five months of the year from May to September inclusive, making Canberra a very unattractive place to which to relocate.

I believe that there is plenty of anecdotal evidence to support the notion that the salaries and wages paid to employees of Australian federal government services, particularly at the executive levels up to secretary, are not high enough to attract Australian citizens of sufficient quality, talent and skill to work for Australian federal government services.

I believe that a case in point is Michael Pezzullo, former Secretary of the Department of Home Affairs, who turned out to be a liability for this Australian federal government service and who, in my view, did not give the appearance, even before he was terminated from his position on 27th November, 2023 and even while he carried out the duties of his position, of being a model employee of the Australian federal government service in which he worked, being the Department of Home Affairs.

Given that employees of the Australian federal government services only number a very small proportion of the entire Australian workforce and given that the work they do is crucially important for the health of Australia as a nation, it is in the best interests of Australian citizens for employees of Australian federal government services to be the highest-quality Australian citizens available.

I believe that Australian federal government services should pay high enough salaries to attract the highest-quality Australian citizens available as employees and then carefully control the total number of employees of Australian federal government services, in order to limit the total cost of salaries and wages associated with Australian federal government services, so that better outcomes from employees of Australian federal government services can be achieved.


> Reintroduce capital punishment involving death by hanging for capital crimes such as treason (e.g. knowingly perpetrating election fraud, knowingly perpetrating the criminal fraud of non-existent COVID-19), murder, pedophilia, rape, aggravated assault, kidnapping, gang stalking and arson.

There is no reason why the perpetration of these capital crimes should result in an obligation by taxpayers in Australia to fund the imprisonment of the perpetrators, which involves supplying them with water, food, clothing and shelter for several years while they are imprisoned.

Capital punishment involving death by hanging for capital crimes provides an ominous warning to citizens that if they commit a capital crime and are convicted in court, they will be executed, irrespective of their race, whether white, Chinese, Indian, other Asian, Muslim, black or any other race.

Execute the convicted perpetrators of capital crimes by hanging in public so that interested Australian citizens can gather and watch. Record the executions and publish them on the internet so that interested Australian citizens who are not able to gather can watch.


> Require that all Australian citizens obtain an Australian Identity Card (AIC) compulsorily which shows their photograph, full name, address, date of birth and Australian Identity Number (AIN), but which contains no electronically stored data, no biometric data and no other data of any type.

There should be no charge by Australian Identity on behalf of the Australian federal government to Australian citizens for obtaining an Australian Identity Card (AIC), on account of all Australian citizens being required to obtain an Australian Identity Card compulsorily, so that the cost of Australian Identity providing all Australian citizens with an Australian Identity Card on behalf of the Australian federal government is funded by income tax.

However, if any Australian citizen loses their Australian Identity Card (AIC) and is therefore required to replace it, they should be charged a fee for replacing their Australian Identity Card on a not-for-profit basis.


> Require that all Australian citizens aged 18 years or over prove their identity using their Australian Identity Card (AIC) in order to be allowed to vote in Australian federal, state, territorial and local government elections, Australian referendums and Australian plebiscites.


> Abolish the two-party-preferred voting system in Australia.


> Criminalise the production of pornography and the distribution of pornography in Australia, in all forms, including paper-based, video, DVD and internet, since freedom of speech only legitimately applies to the spoken or written word, as a means of preventing Australian citizens from viewing pornography, on the basis that a lot of pornography that is available in Australia is produced by citizens of countries other than Australia in countries other than Australia and on the basis that viewing pornography is harmful to Australian citizens and therefore harmful to the health of Australia as a nation.

In practice, the only way for the Australian federal government to effectively and efficiently criminalise the distribution of pornography in Australia, in all forms, including paper-based, video, DVD and internet, since freedom of speech only legitimately applies to the spoken or written word, as a means of preventing Australian citizens from viewing pornography, is for an Australian federal government entity to maintain a list of websites and web pages that Australian citizens are banned from viewing in Australia, on the grounds that these websites and web pages contain pornography, so that all internet service providers (ISPs) in Australia have clear guidance from the Australian federal government about which websites and web pages they need to censor, when providing internet access to Australian citizens, in order to comply with the criminalisation of the distribution of pornography in Australia by the Australian federal government.

Since the Australian federal government obviously wants to censor other websites and web pages on the internet, such as websites and web pages associated with gambling and various types of criminality, it is very important that the list of all of the websites and web pages censored by the Australian federal government is segmented by appropriate categories, such as “Drug Use”, “Gambling”, Pornography” and “Violence”.

It is also very important that the list of all of the websites and web pages censored by the Australian federal government is publicly available to all Australian citizens, so that they can be confident that the Australian federal government is not censoring websites and web pages that Australian citizens have a legitimate right to access.


> Ban non-white immigration into Australia, which causes the number of people living in Australia to increase, thereby causing demand for residential properties in Australia in all forms, including houses, apartments and land, to increase and thereby causing house prices to increase.

white-alliance.blog/australia-population-and-demographic-data-1900-to-2022/


Non-white immigrants to Australia generally do not buy residential properties in Australia as soon as they arrive in Australia. It generally takes time for them to get their finances in order and save up a deposit in order to buy residential properties in Australia. There is generally a lag, often of years, between non-white immigrants to Australia arriving in Australia and demand for the purchase of residential properties in Australia in all forms, including houses, apartments and land, increasing as a result of their arrival in Australia.

Non-white immigration into Australia also provides a strong stream of tenants to create demand for residential rental properties in Australia, so that residential property investors can confidently earn rental income from their residential rental properties that they own as residential investment properties in Australia. Non-white immigration into Australia leads to an increase in demand for residential rental properties in Australia and an increase in rents. In the 1990s and 2000s, passive income in the form of rents from residential investment properties in Australia, being income earned without working for it, was marketed by the residential property industry in Australia as the holy grail of income. Australia’s economy has been built around this concept of passive income ever since.

Banning non-white immigration into Australia (and deporting non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees) back to their countries of origin) would cause house prices in Australia to decrease by at least 30%, which is unavoidably necessary in order to make housing more affordable in Australia.


> Ban the purchase and ownership of residential properties in Australia by non-citizens of Australia, which increases demand for residential properties in Australia, thereby causing house prices to increase.

That the Australian federal government has not banned the purchase and ownership of residential properties in Australia by non-citizens of Australia shows that the Australian federal government does not govern exclusively for Australian citizens but for non-citizens of Australia also, of whom there are purportedly more than 8 billion (i.e. 8,000 million). Allowing non-citizens of Australia to purchase and own residential properties in Australia causes the number of people who want to purchase and own residential properties in Australia to increase, thereby causing demand for housing in Australia to increase and thereby causing house prices in Australia to increase.

Banning the purchase and ownership of residential properties in Australia by non-citizens of Australia would cause house prices in Australia to decrease by at least 15%, which is unavoidably necessary in order to make housing more affordable in Australia.


> Ban bank lending to residential property investors for residential investment properties in Australia, which increases demand for residential properties in Australia, thereby causing house prices to increase.

This includes bank lending to residential property investors who are using their superannuation in order to fund part of the purchase price of residential investment properties in Australia. The very definition of investment entails purchasing an asset out of savings. No bank in Australia should be allowed to lend for the purpose of the borrower purchasing an asset for investment with the objective of making a capital gain over time, such as real estate, shares, precious metals, coins, antiques or art. Borrowing for such a purchase is not investment. It is speculation. However, if such a purchase is financed out of existing savings, rather than borrowings, then it can correctly be called an “investment”.

Without bank lending to residential property investors, the overwhelming majority of residential property investors would not be able to afford to purchase residential investment properties in Australia in the first place. Bank lending to residential property investors therefore makes purchasing residential investment properties in Australia more affordable for residential property investors and causes demand for residential investment properties in Australia from residential property investors to increase, thereby causing house prices in Australia to increase.

Banning bank lending to residential property investors for residential investment properties in Australia would cause house prices in Australia to decrease by at least 15%, which is unavoidably necessary in order to make housing more affordable in Australia.


> Ban negative gearing, which increases demand for residential properties in Australia, thereby causing house prices to increase, by allowing the tax deductibility of residential investment property losses against other sources of income, such as salaries and wages, even though it is not necessary to incur those losses in order to earn those other sources of income.

A bedrock principle of income tax law in Australia has always been that deductions against income must be expenses that were necessarily incurred in order to earn that income. The deductibility of residential investment property losses against other sources of income, such as salaries and wages, violates this principle.

Without negative gearing, the overwhelming majority of residential property investors would not be able to afford to meet the repayments required by the mortgages they took out to purchase their residential investment properties in Australia and therefore would not have been able to purchase their residential investment properties in Australia in the first place. Negative gearing therefore makes purchasing residential investment properties in Australia more affordable for residential property investors, thereby causing demand for residential investment properties in Australia from residential property investors to increase, thereby causing demand for residential properties in Australia to increase (whereby residential property investors compete with owner occupiers in order to purchase residential properties in Australia) and thereby causing house prices in Australia to increase.

Banning negative gearing would cause house prices in Australia to decrease by at least 15%, which is unavoidably necessary in order to make housing more affordable in Australia.


> The age of eligibility for Elderly Payments in Australia should be reduced to 60 years, which would cause the annual cost of Elderly Payments to increase by approximately $12 billion from approximately $53 billion to approximately $65 billion.

Importantly, immigration into Australia causes inflation by increasing the size of the population of Australia and thereby increasing demand for goods and services (as well as assets), so that the prices of goods (e.g. groceries) and services (e.g. residential properties for rent) (as well as assets (e.g. residential properties)) increase, which pressures the Australian federal government to increase the amount of taxpayer funds it spends on welfare payments to Australian citizens receiving Veteran Payments, Elderly Payments, Disability Payments, Carer Payments, Child Carer Payments or Unemployment Payments, so that these Australian citizens can meet the increasing cost of living resulting from the inflation that immigration into Australia has caused by increasing the size of the population of Australia, which results in the Australian federal government increasing the amount of taxpayer funds it spends on welfare each year, comprising welfare payments to Australian citizens receiving Veteran Payments, Elderly Payments, Disability Payments, Carer Payments, Child Carer Payments or Unemployment Payments.

Therefore, the Australian federal government could reduce the annual cost of all welfare payments, by a minimum of 10% (i.e. approximately $10 billion) by reducing inflation in Australia via banning non-white immigration into Australia, deporting non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees) and offering non-white citizens of Australia, obviously with the exception of indigenous, Aboriginal Australian citizens, amounts of money, such as $7,500 for adults and $2,500 for minors, to voluntarily relinquish their Australian citizenship and return to their countries of origin, in order to reduce demand for goods (e.g. groceries) and services (e.g. residential properties for rent) (as well as assets (e.g. residential properties)), thereby causing the prices of goods (e.g. groceries) and services (e.g. residential properties for rent) (as well as assets (e.g. residential properties)) to decrease, thereby enabling the Australian federal government to reduce the size of all welfare payments that eligible Australian citizens receive.

This reduction in the cost of all welfare payments, via banning non-white immigration into Australia, deporting non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees (with the exception of genuine refugees) back to their countries of origin and non-white non-citizens of Australia, obviously with the exception of indigenous, Aboriginal Australian citizens, amounts of money to voluntarily relinquish their Australian citizenship and return to their countries of origin, could be used to fund a reduction in the age of eligibility for Elderly Payments in Australia to 60 years.


> Abolish compulsory superannuation, which is confiscation of income earned by Australian citizens who are subject to compulsory superannuation and an attack on the property rights of Australian citizens over their income earned.

Employers do not make compulsory superannuation contributions on behalf of employees as gifts without receiving anything in return. Employees earn the superannuation that is paid by employers on their behalf via the work they perform as employees of employers. However, employees are generally not able to access and utilise the superannuation that is paid by employers on their behalf until they reach the preservation age, which is between 55 years of age and 60 years of age inclusive.

Therefore, compulsory superannuation is confiscation of income earned by Australian citizens who are subject to compulsory superannuation and an attack on the property rights of Australian citizens over their income earned.

Under the current rate of compulsory superannuation in Australia of 11.0%, this confiscation of income earned by Austrailan citizens who are subject to compulsory superannuation amounts to 9.9% (i.e. 11/111 x 100%) of their income earned.


> Reverse any undesirable Australian local government amalgamations that have occurred in the last ten years or longer.


> Hold an Australian referendum on abolishing the Australian Senate on account of its anti-democratic nature in the form of its tendency to vote against constructive legislation that a majority of elected Australian representatives in the House of Representatives in the Australian federal parliament have agreed to.


> Redefine existing Australian electorates of elected Australian Representatives in the Australian Forum of Representatives in the Australian Parliament (currently “Australian House of Representatives”) to match existing Australian local government areas, which number circa five hundred thirty-seven (537).

There should be one elected Australian Representative from each Australian electorate in the Australian Forum of Representatives in the Australian Parliament, numbering circa five hundred thirty-seven (537) elected Australian Representatives.

The vote of each elected Australian Representative in the Australian Forum of Representatives in the Australian Parliament should be weighted according to the number of Australian citizens aged eighteen (18) years or over in their Australian electorate at the start of the current financial year as a percentage of the total number of Australian citizens aged eighteen (18) years or over in the entirety of Australia at the start of the current financial year.

The Australian Forum of Representatives in the Australian Parliament should set up a computerised voting system for the Australian Forum of Representatives in the Australian Parliament in order to facilitate the effective and efficient use of weighted votes of the elected Australian Representatives in the Australian Forum of Representatives in the Australian Parliament.


> The operation of the Australian federal parliament, conducted via oral representations made by elected Australian federal representatives on behalf of Australian citizens, has failed in Australia.

The task in the Australian federal parliament of representing circa seventeen (17) million Australian citizens of voting age eighteen (18) years or over via oral representations made on behalf of Australian citizens in the Australian federal parliament is too great for one hundred fifty-one (151) elected Australian federal representatives of Australian citizens in the Australian federal parliament and is even too great for circa five hundred thirty-seven (537) elected representatives in the Australian federal parliament, representing each of the circa five hundred thirty-seven (537) Australian local government areas.

The operation of the Australian federal parliament, conducted via written representations made by elected Australian federal representatives on behalf of Australian citizens on a purpose-built, online discussion forum, hosted on a website on the internet, complete with presumably configurable polls for voting on issues via the internet, will ensure the success of the Australian federal parliament.

Fortuitously, such a purpose-built, online discussion forum, hosted on the internet, can be readily configured to enable Australian citizens to read the discussions amongst their elected Australian Representatives take place without obviously allowing them to participate in these discussions, on account of their enormous numbers in the millions in comparison to the maximum of circa five hundred thirty-seven (537) elected Australian representatives taking part in these online discussions in good faith.

This method of debating issues online in writing on a purpose-built discussion forum will require more time per given issue being debated.

However, this method of debating issues online in writing on a purpose-built discussion forum will achieve a vastly superior result to the existing method of debating issues in person via oral representations made by elected Australian federal representatives on behalf of Australian citizens.

Objectively, anybody can learn to touch-type without looking at their fingers on the keyboard. All it takes is 15 minutes practice each day for one to three months.

Learning to touch-type is actually enjoyable because it is the process of learning a highly valuable skill. Obviously, the longer one practices touch-typing each day, the quicker one will learn to touch-type. However, it is really only necessary to practice touch-typing for 15 minutes each day in order to learn how to touch-type. After a while, touch-typing without looking at one’s fingers becomes second nature, which is a highly valuable skill that produces enormous benefits on a daily basis.

TypeQuick supplies excellent touch-typing courses which teach the correct fingering to use in a fun way and can be completed online.

typequick.com.au

typequick.com.au/about-typequick

typequick.com.au/products


> Abolish the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS), which currently belongs to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

Abolish the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), which currently belongs to the Department of Home Affairs.

Abolish the Office of National Intelligence (ONI), which currently belongs to the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Intelligence_Community#Australian_Intelligence_Community


> Australia should become a republic.

An Australian referendum would need to be held about whether Australia should become a republic and the “Yes” vote would need to prevail, in order for Australia to become a republic.

As far as I can tell, there are minimal changes that need to take place in Australia for Australia to become a republic.

For example, the Constitution of Australia (ideally named the “Australian Constitution”) would need to be appropriately modified, in order to sever all ties between Australia and the monarchy of the United Kingdom.

In my opinion, the role of the Australian Governor-General should remain as the highest office in Australia, in order to exercise oversight over Australia for the benefit of Australian citizens.

In my opinion, candidates for the role of the Australian Governor-General should only be selected from eminent judges with strong track records in the Australian Judiciary, on account of the desirability of the Australian Governor-General having a comprehensive understanding of the legal system in Australia and on account of such candidates being predisposed to having the prolific, commanding intellect required to occupy the role of the Australian Governor-General as the highest office in Australia, in order to exercise oversight over Australia for the benefit of Australian citizens.



Top



The Australian federal government needs a mission statement…


The Australian federal government needs a mission statement such as the following:

“The purpose of the Australian federal government is to serve the best interests of Australian citizens and improve Australia for their benefit, as a positive example to other countries around the world.”



Top